Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mortality trends around the one-year survival mark after heart, liver, and lung transplantation in the United States.
Nathan, Ashwin S; Blebea, Catherine; Chatterjee, Paula; Thomasson, Arwin; Diamond, Joshua M; Groeneveld, Peter W; Giri, Jay; Goldberg, Hilary J; Courtwright, Andrew M.
Afiliação
  • Nathan AS; Cardiovascular Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Blebea C; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Chatterjee P; Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, and Evaluative Research Center, Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Thomasson A; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Diamond JM; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Groeneveld PW; Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Giri J; Pulmonary Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Goldberg HJ; Pulmonary Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Courtwright AM; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 34(6): e13852, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32167191
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

One-year post-transplant survival is a significant quality measure for solid organ transplant programs in the United States. It is not known whether the use of this metric is associated with changes in life-sustaining clinical practices that would delay mortality for solid organ recipients until just beyond the one-year time point.

METHODS:

We compared trends in mortality in the time period immediately preceding the one-year post-transplant mark compared to the period immediately after using second-order Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS:

Among recipients of heart, liver, and lung transplantation, mortality did not decrease significantly in the period immediately before day 365 or increase in the 14 days thereafter. There was an increased adjusted hazard of mortality in the 30 days following day 365 among lung transplant recipients (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.72, P = .03) with a 0.76% absolute mortality rate (94 deaths) in month 12 following lung transplantation and a 1.14% absolute mortality rate in month 13 (113 deaths).

CONCLUSION:

Although we did not find evidence that life-sustaining treatment is routinely continued until just beyond the one-year mark in heart and liver transplantation recipients, there was an unexpected increased risk of mortality in the 30 days following day 365 among lung transplant recipients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Órgãos / Transplante de Coração / Transplante de Pulmão Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Órgãos / Transplante de Coração / Transplante de Pulmão Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos