Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conventional weight loss interventions across the different BMI obesity classes: A systematic review and quantitative comparative analysis.
Bauer, Kerstin; Lau, Teresa; Schwille-Kiuntke, Juliane; Schild, Sandra; Hauner, Hans; Stengel, Andreas; Zipfel, Stephan; Mack, Isabelle.
Afiliação
  • Bauer K; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Lau T; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Schwille-Kiuntke J; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Schild S; Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Hauner H; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Stengel A; Institute of Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical university of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Zipfel S; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Mack I; Charité Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Eur Eat Disord Rev ; 28(5): 492-512, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32363695
OBJECTIVE: The recommendation for conventional body weight loss (BWL) treatment in obesity is 5-10%. It is not clear whether BWL is similar across the three different body mass index (BMI) obesity classes. The aim was to provide an overview on BWL across these classes in moderate lifestyle/diet intervention programs. METHOD: A systematic literature search was conducted and the evidence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pre-post design studies synthesized. The outcome was BWL. RESULTS: For RCTs, mean BWL in the intervention group was 3.6 kg (class I) and 5.3 kg (class II), which equates to 4 and 5% BWL, respectively. None of the assessed class III obesity studies met the inclusion criteria. For pre-post design studies, mean BWL was 5.4 kg (class I), 5.5 kg (class II) and 7.9 kg (class III), with high variation within and across studies in the latter. This equates to 6, 5 and, 6% BWL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BWL of moderate BWL programs are similar across the different obesity classes. For class I obesity, the results differ between RCT and pre-post design studies by 2% BWL. The high variation of BWL in class III obesity might reflect different states of motivation such as the attitude towards bariatric surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Programas de Redução de Peso / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Eat Disord Rev Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Programas de Redução de Peso / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Eat Disord Rev Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha