Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The capacity for psychotherapy process scale: development and psychometric validation of patient self-reports.
Hou, Yan-Fei; Liu, Ding; Zhou, She-Gang; Xie, Zhao-Ming; Yang, Xue-Ling; Zhou, Ying; Zhang, Xiao-Yuan.
Afiliação
  • Hou YF; Department of Psychology, School of Public Health (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
  • Liu D; Department of Psychology, School of Public Health (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhou SG; Department of Psychology, Institute of Education, Henan Normal University, Henan, Xinxiang, People's Republic of China.
  • Xie ZM; Department of Psychology, School of Public Health (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
  • Yang XL; Department of Psychology, School of Public Health (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhou Y; Department of Psychology, School of Public Health (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhang XY; Department of Psychology, School of Public Health (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Psychother Res ; 31(2): 236-246, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32496976
Objective: Studies were conducted to develop and validate the Capacity for Psychotherapy Process Scale (CFPPS), a self-rating measure of capacity for the psychotherapy process from a trans-theoretical perspective. Method: In Study 1, a two-round Delphi methodology consulting 27 and 15 experts, respectively, was used to select items and identify content validity. In Study 2, 279 clients were recruited for exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In Study 3, confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency analysis were conducted among 390 outpatients; the discriminant validity and predictive validity were studied in 270 outpatients and 82 psychotherapy outpatients, respectively. Results: The Delphi method resulted in 52 items. Through EFA, the CFPPS was reduced to 20 items, focusing on five factors: motivation, belief, self-revelation, persistence, and insight; the internal consistencies were good (0.92 for total scale and 0.82-0.91 for the factors). The CFPPS was not or was only weakly associated with symptoms. The Bonferroni-corrected partial correlation analyses revealed that the CFPPS was positively related to working alliance and session impact. Conclusions: The CFPPS is a preliminary step toward the self-report assessment of the capacity for psychotherapy process from a trans-theoretical perspective and may potentially be used to predict the working alliance and session impact.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicoterapia / Processos Psicoterapêuticos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychother Res Assunto da revista: PSICOLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicoterapia / Processos Psicoterapêuticos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychother Res Assunto da revista: PSICOLOGIA / PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article