Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Enhancing rotational placement of reconstruction prostheses of the distal femur after sarcoma resection.
De Smet, Arne; Verrewaere, Dries; Sys, Gwen.
Afiliação
  • De Smet A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Electronic address: Arne.de.smet@vub.be.
  • Verrewaere D; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium. Electronic address: Dries.verrewaere@ugent.be.
  • Sys G; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium. Electronic address: Gwen.Sys@ugent.be.
Med Eng Phys ; 81: 47-57, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32507678
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Currently there are no accepted international guidelines for the correct placement of reconstruction prostheses in the axial plane of the femur after en bloc resection. The most accepted method is based on the linea aspera as an intraoperative landmark, indicating posterior. This study was conducted to address the reliability of the linea aspera as a landmark for rotational alignment. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

50 CT angiographies of the right limb were used for this purpose. These 2D images were reconstructed into 3D models using proprietary software (materialize NV, Leuven, Belgium). The posterior condylar line was used as a reference axis. The orientation of the linea aspera was described as the angle between the perpendicular line to the PCL, through the center of the diaphysis, and the lateral (α) and medial labium (ß).

RESULTS:

The linear mixed model shows that the α- and ß-angles are significantly associated with the distance from the joint line (p<0.001) and vary significantly between subjects (p<0.001). The α-angle has the lowest variance and approximates more closely true posterior, while the median ß-angle never overlaps true posterior.

DISCUSSION:

When a surgeon would blindly rely on the linea aspera as a posterior landmark roughly 78% of the femoral implants would exceed the accepted ±3° deviation around the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) as defined in total knee replacement. The linea aspera is not a reliable landmark for axial rotation of femoral implants. The position is highly dependent on the osteotomy height and in addition differs between individual patients. Preoperative assessment of the linea aspera is advocated in order to reduce the risk of malrotation. As the height of the osteotomy cannot always be determined correctly preoperatively, a table was designed as a guideline for how much a deviation from the planned resection height will affect the rotation of the implant.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rotação / Sarcoma / Artroplastia do Joelho / Fêmur / Articulação do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Med Eng Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rotação / Sarcoma / Artroplastia do Joelho / Fêmur / Articulação do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Med Eng Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article