Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shared and unique risk factors for tobacco use among rural versus urban adolescents.
Roberts, Megan E; Teferra, Andreas A; Keller-Hamilton, Brittney; Patterson, Joanne G; Ferketich, Amy K.
Afiliação
  • Roberts ME; College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America. Electronic address: roberts.1558@osu.edu.
  • Teferra AA; College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America.
  • Keller-Hamilton B; Center for Tobacco Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 3650 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH 43214, United States of America.
  • Patterson JG; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 400A Cunz, 1841 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America.
  • Ferketich AK; College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America.
Prev Med ; 140: 106239, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853669
Researchers have proposed numerous factors that may contribute to rural adolescents' heightened risk for tobacco use. Some of these include well-known risk factors for tobacco use, whereas others concern factors unique to rural populations, reflecting norms and values ("rural culture") that accept and encourage tobacco use. This study aimed to test a broad range of tobacco-use risk factors to determine which were a) universal risk factors for both urban and rural adolescents vs. b) unique risk factors for rural adolescents. Data came from a prospective cohort study of 1220 adolescent males in Ohio who were aged 11-16 (average = 14 years) when surveyed at baseline (2015-2016). Follow-up surveys occurred every 6 months. The present study examined tobacco-use outcomes-prevalent use and incident use-by the two-year follow-up (2017-2018). Findings indicated a higher prevalence of ever-use of cigarette and smokeless tobacco among rural, vs. urban, adolescents at baseline. By the two-year follow-up, the urban/rural difference was attenuated but remained. Stratified multivariable logistic regression indicated that some baseline risk factors were associated with subsequent tobacco use for both rural and urban adolescents. Having an adult tobacco user in the home (for prevalent use) and susceptibility to a male family member offer of tobacco products (for both prevalent and incident use) were associated with tobacco use only for rural adolescents. These findings align with qualitative work demonstrating that masculinity and an intergenerational tobacco culture are important to male adolescents. This unique rural profile should be considered when developing prevention efforts.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Tabaco sem Fumaça Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Tabaco sem Fumaça Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article