Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Brain Volume Fractions in Mammals in Relation to Behavior in Carnivores, Primates, Ungulates, and Rodents.
Grisham, William; Greta, Sarah; Schottler, Natalie; Tomita, William; Burre, Anthony; Rostamian, Dalar; Pishchalenko, Olena; Thomas, Sarah T.
Afiliação
  • Grisham W; Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Louisiana, USA, dr.billgrisham@gmail.com.
  • Greta S; Chemistry, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Schottler N; Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Louisiana, USA.
  • Tomita W; Neuroscience, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Burre A; Neuroscience, WM Keck Science Department, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, California, USA.
  • Rostamian D; Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Louisiana, USA.
  • Pishchalenko O; Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Louisiana, USA.
  • Thomas ST; Computational and Systems Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Brain Behav Evol ; 95(2): 102-112, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32862179
The volume fraction (VF) of a given brain region, or the proper mass, ought to reflect the importance of that region in the life of a given species. This study sought to examine the VF of various brain regions across 61 different species of mammals to discern if there were regularities or differences among mammalian orders. We examined the brains of carnivores (n = 17), ungulates (n = 8), rodents (n = 7), primates (n = 11), and other mammals (n = 18) from the online collections at the National Museum of Health and Medicine. We measured and obtained the VF of several brain regions: the striatum, thalamus, neocortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, and piriform area. We refined our analyses by using phylogenetic size correction, yielding the corrected (c)VF. Our groups showed marked differences in gross brain architecture. Primates and carnivores were divergent in some measures, particularly the cVF of the striatum, even though their overall brain size range was roughly the same. Rodents predictably had relatively large cVFs of subcortical structures due to the fact that their neocortical cVF was smaller, particularly when compared to primates. Not so predictably, rodents had the largest cerebellar cVF, and there were marked discrepancies in cerebellar data across groups. Ungulates had a larger piriform area than primates, perhaps due to their olfactory processing abilities. We provide interpretations of our results in the light of the comparative behavioral and neuroanatomical literature.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Animal / Encéfalo / Mamíferos Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Brain Behav Evol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Animal / Encéfalo / Mamíferos Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Brain Behav Evol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article