Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Halo pin positioning in the temporal bone; parameters for safe halo gravity traction.
Semmelink, K; Hekman, E E G; van Griethuysen, M; Bosma, J; Swaan, A; Kruyt, M C.
Afiliação
  • Semmelink K; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Hekman EEG; Department of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • van Griethuysen M; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Bosma J; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Swaan A; Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Kruyt MC; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Spine Deform ; 9(1): 255-261, 2021 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915397
INTRODUCTION: Halo gravity traction (HGT) is increasingly used pre-operatively in the treatment of children with complex spinal deformities. However, the design of the current halo crowns is not optimal for that purpose. To prevent pin loosening and to avoid visual scars, fixation to the temporal area would be preferable. This study aims to determine whether this area could be safe for positioning HGT pins. METHODS: A custom made traction setup plus three human cadaver skulls were used to determine the most optimal pin location, the resistance to migration and the load to failure on the temporal bone. A custom-made spring-loaded pin with an adjustable axial force was used. For the migration experiment, this pin was positioned at 10 predefined anatomical areas in the temporal region of adult cadaver skulls, with different predefined axial forces. Subsequently traction force was applied and increased until migration occurred. For the load-to-failure experiment, the pin was positioned on the most applicable temporal location on both sides of the skull. RESULTS: The most optimal position was identified as just antero-cranial to the auricle. The resistance to migration was clearly related to the axial tightening force. With an axial force of only 100 N, which corresponds to a torque of 0.06 Nm (0.5 in-lb), a vertical traction force of at least 200 N was needed for pin migration. A tightening force of 200 N (torque 0.2 Nm or 2 in-lb) was sufficient to resist migration at the maximal applied force of 360 N for all but one of the pins. The load-to-failure experiment showed a failure range of 780-1270 N axial force, which was not obviously related to skull thickness. CONCLUSION: The temporal bone area of adult skulls allows axial tightening forces that are well above those needed for HGT in children. The generally applied torque of 0.5 Nm (4 in-lb) which corresponds to about 350 N axial force, appeared well below the failure load of these skulls and much higher than needed for firm fixation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tração / Vértebras Cervicais Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Spine Deform Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tração / Vértebras Cervicais Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Spine Deform Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda