Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influences on NHS Health Check behaviours: a systematic review.
Atkins, Lou; Stefanidou, Chryssa; Chadborn, Tim; Thompson, Katherine; Michie, Susan; Lorencatto, Fabi.
Afiliação
  • Atkins L; Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, WC1N 3AZ, London, UK. l.atkins@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Stefanidou C; Public Health England Behavioural Insights, London, UK.
  • Chadborn T; Public Health England Behavioural Insights, London, UK.
  • Thompson K; Public Health England Behavioural Insights, London, UK.
  • Michie S; Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, WC1N 3AZ, London, UK.
  • Lorencatto F; Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, WC1N 3AZ, London, UK.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1359, 2020 Sep 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938432
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

National Health Service Health Checks were introduced in 2009 to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks and events. Since then, national evaluations have highlighted the need to maximise the programme's impact by improving coverage and outputs. To address these challenges it is important to understand the extent to which positive behaviours are influenced across the NHS Health Check pathway and encourage the promotion or minimisation of behavioural facilitators and barriers respectively. This study applied behavioural science frameworks to i) identify behaviours and actors relevant to uptake, delivery and follow up of NHS Health Checks and influences on these behaviours and; ii) signpost to example intervention content.

METHODS:

A systematic review of studies reporting behaviours related to NHS Health Check-related behaviours of patients, health care professionals (HCPs) and commissioners. Influences on behaviours were coded using theory-based models COM-B and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Potential intervention types and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were suggested to target key influences.

RESULTS:

We identified 37 studies reporting nine behaviours and influences for eight of these. The most frequently identified influences were physical opportunity including HCPs having space and time to deliver NHS Health Checks and patients having money to adhere to recommendations to change diet and physical activity. Other key influences were motivational, such as beliefs about consequences about the value of NHS Health Checks and behaviour change, and social, such as influences of others on behaviour change. The following techniques are suggested for websites or smartphone apps Adding objects to the environment, e.g. provide HCPs with electronic schedules to guide timely delivery of Health Checks to target physical opportunity, Social support (unspecified), e.g. include text suggesting patients to ask a colleague to agree in advance to join them in taking the 'healthy option' lunch at work; Information about health consequences, e.g. quotes and/or videos from patients talking about the health benefits of changes they have made.

CONCLUSIONS:

Through the application of behavioural science we identified key behaviours and their influences which informed recommendations for intervention content. To ascertain the extent to which this reflects existing interventions we recommend a review of relevant evidence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Estatal / Pessoal de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Estatal / Pessoal de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido