A consequentialist ethical analysis of federal funding of elective abortions.
Bioethics
; 35(4): 331-336, 2021 05.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33594696
ABSTRACT
Insurance coverage of abortion varies widely across the United States and is an extensively debated issue. Medicaid coverage of abortion is particularly relevant because the majority of abortion patients are poor or low-income and are thus often covered by Medicaid. Since the Hyde Amendment was first passed in 1976, federal Medicaid funds have been banned from covering the costs of elective abortion. Although states are allowed to use their own funds to cover abortions for their Medicaid recipients, only 17 states currently do so. Of these 17 states, only five cover abortion costs voluntarily; the others do so pursuant to court order. The medical literature includes few ethical analyses of the Hyde Amendment's ban on Medicaid funding of elective abortions. To fill this gap, we perform an ethical analysis of federal policy to fund elective abortions using a consequentialist approach focused on consequences for pregnant women and their children.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Aborto Induzido
/
Administração Financeira
Limite:
Child
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Pregnancy
País/Região como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Bioethics
Assunto da revista:
ETICA
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Estados Unidos