Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
INTACT vs. FANS for Cell-Type-Specific Nuclei Sorting: A Comprehensive Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison.
Chongtham, Monika Chanu; Butto, Tamer; Mungikar, Kanak; Gerber, Susanne; Winter, Jennifer.
Afiliação
  • Chongtham MC; Leibniz Institute of Resilience Research, Wallstr 7, 55122 Mainz, Germany.
  • Butto T; Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Mungikar K; Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Gerber S; Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • Winter J; Leibniz Institute of Resilience Research, Wallstr 7, 55122 Mainz, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(10)2021 May 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34069481
ABSTRACT
Increasing numbers of studies seek to characterize the different cellular sub-populations present in mammalian tissues. The techniques "Isolation of Nuclei Tagged in Specific Cell Types" (INTACT) or "Fluorescence-Activated Nuclei Sorting" (FANS) are frequently used for isolating nuclei of specific cellular subtypes. These nuclei are then used for molecular characterization of the cellular sub-populations. Despite the increasing popularity of both techniques, little is known about their isolation efficiency, advantages, and disadvantages or downstream molecular effects. In our study, we compared the physical and molecular attributes of sfGFP+ nuclei isolated by the two methods-INTACT and FANS-from the neocortices of Arc-CreERT2 × CAG-Sun1/sfGFP animals. We identified differences in efficiency of sfGFP+ nuclei isolation, nuclear size as well as transcriptional (RNA-seq) and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq) states. Therefore, our study presents a comprehensive comparison between the two widely used nuclei sorting techniques, identifying the advantages and disadvantages for both INTACT and FANS. Our conclusions are summarized in a table to guide researchers in selecting the most suitable methodology for their individual experimental design.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Separação Celular / Citometria de Fluxo Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Int J Mol Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Separação Celular / Citometria de Fluxo Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Int J Mol Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha