Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Large-scale genomic analysis reveals the genetic cost of chicken domestication.
Wang, Ming-Shan; Zhang, Jin-Jin; Guo, Xing; Li, Ming; Meyer, Rachel; Ashari, Hidayat; Zheng, Zhu-Qing; Wang, Sheng; Peng, Min-Sheng; Jiang, Yu; Thakur, Mukesh; Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon; Esmailizadeh, Ali; Hirimuthugoda, Nalini Yasoda; Zein, Moch Syamsul Arifin; Kusza, Szilvia; Kharrati-Koopaee, Hamed; Zeng, Lin; Wang, Yun-Mei; Yin, Ting-Ting; Yang, Min-Min; Li, Ming-Li; Lu, Xue-Mei; Lasagna, Emiliano; Ceccobelli, Simone; Gunwardana, Humpita Gamaralalage Thilini Nisanka; Senasig, Thilina Madusanka; Feng, Shao-Hong; Zhang, Hao; Bhuiyan, Abul Kashem Fazlul Haque; Khan, Muhammad Sajjad; Silva, Gamamada Liyanage Lalanie Pradeepa; Thuy, Le Thi; Mwai, Okeyo A; Ibrahim, Mohamed Nawaz Mohamed; Zhang, Guojie; Qu, Kai-Xing; Hanotte, Olivier; Shapiro, Beth; Bosse, Mirte; Wu, Dong-Dong; Han, Jian-Lin; Zhang, Ya-Ping.
Afiliação
  • Wang MS; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Zhang JJ; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Guo X; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
  • Li M; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
  • Meyer R; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Ashari H; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Zheng ZQ; College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
  • Wang S; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
  • Peng MS; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
  • Jiang Y; Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Science (LIPI), Cibinong, Bogor, 16911, Indonesia.
  • Thakur M; CAAS-ILRI Joint Laboratory on Livestock and Forage Genetic Resources, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, 100193, China.
  • Suwannapoom C; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, The Cooperative Innovation Center for Sustainable Pig Production, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
  • Esmailizadeh A; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Hirimuthugoda NY; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Zein MSA; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Kusza S; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Kharrati-Koopaee H; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
  • Zeng L; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Wang YM; Zoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700053, India.
  • Yin TT; School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao, Phayao, 56000, Thailand.
  • Yang MM; Unit of Excellence on Biodiversity and Natural Resources Management, University of Phayao, Phayao, 56000, Thailand.
  • Li ML; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Lu XM; Department of Animal Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, P.O. Box 76169133, Kerman, Iran.
  • Lasagna E; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Ceccobelli S; Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.
  • Gunwardana HGTN; Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Science (LIPI), Cibinong, Bogor, 16911, Indonesia.
  • Senasig TM; Institute of Animal Husbandry, Biotechnology and Nature Conservation, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
  • Feng SH; Department of Animal Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, P.O. Box 76169133, Kerman, Iran.
  • Zhang H; Institute of Biotechnology, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, P.O. Box 1585, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Bhuiyan AKFH; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Khan MS; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Silva GLLP; Center for Neurobiology and Brain Restoration, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, 143026, Russia.
  • Thuy LT; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Mwai OA; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Ibrahim MNM; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Zhang G; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Qu KX; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Hanotte O; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Shapiro B; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
  • Bosse M; Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Wu DD; Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, China.
  • Han JL; Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentarie Ambientali, University of Perugia, 06123, Perugia, Italy.
  • Zhang YP; Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentarie Ambientali, University of Perugia, 06123, Perugia, Italy.
BMC Biol ; 19(1): 118, 2021 06 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34130700
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Species domestication is generally characterized by the exploitation of high-impact mutations through processes that involve complex shifting demographics of domesticated species. These include not only inbreeding and artificial selection that may lead to the emergence of evolutionary bottlenecks, but also post-divergence gene flow and introgression. Although domestication potentially affects the occurrence of both desired and undesired mutations, the way wild relatives of domesticated species evolve and how expensive the genetic cost underlying domestication is remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the demographic history and genetic load of chicken domestication.

RESULTS:

We analyzed a dataset comprising over 800 whole genomes from both indigenous chickens and wild jungle fowls. We show that despite having a higher genetic diversity than their wild counterparts (average π, 0.00326 vs. 0.00316), the red jungle fowls, the present-day domestic chickens experienced a dramatic population size decline during their early domestication. Our analyses suggest that the concomitant bottleneck induced 2.95% more deleterious mutations across chicken genomes compared with red jungle fowls, supporting the "cost of domestication" hypothesis. Particularly, we find that 62.4% of deleterious SNPs in domestic chickens are maintained in heterozygous states and masked as recessive alleles, challenging the power of modern breeding programs to effectively eliminate these genetic loads. Finally, we suggest that positive selection decreases the incidence but increases the frequency of deleterious SNPs in domestic chicken genomes.

CONCLUSION:

This study reveals a new landscape of demographic history and genomic changes associated with chicken domestication and provides insight into the evolutionary genomic profiles of domesticated animals managed under modern human selection.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Galinhas / Domesticação Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Biol Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Galinhas / Domesticação Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Biol Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China