Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Classification and regression trees for predicting the risk of a negative test result for tuberculosis infection in Brazilian healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study.
Souza, Fernanda Mattos; Prado, Thiago Nascimento do; Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro; Luiz, Ronir Raggio; Maciel, Ethel Leonor Noia; Faerstein, Eduardo; Trajman, Anete.
Afiliação
  • Souza FM; Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
  • Prado TND; Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - Vitória (ES), Brazil.
  • Werneck GL; Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
  • Luiz RR; McGill University - Montreal (QC), Canada.
  • Maciel ELN; McGill University - Montreal (QC), Canada.
  • Faerstein E; Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - Vitória (ES), Brazil.
  • Trajman A; Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
Rev Bras Epidemiol ; 24: e210035, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34133620
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Healthcare workers (HCWs) have a high risk of acquiring tuberculosis infection (TBI). However, annual testing is resource-consuming. We aimed to develop a predictive model to identify HCWs best targeted for TBI screening.

METHODOLOGY:

We conducted a secondary analysis of previously published results of 708 HCWs working in primary care services in five Brazilian State capitals who underwent two TBI tests tuberculin skin test and Quantiferon®-TB Gold in-tube. We used a classification and regression tree (CART) model to predict HCWs with negative results for both tests. The performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC), cross-validated using the same dataset.

RESULTS:

Among the 708 HCWs, 247 (34.9%) had negative results for both tests. CART identified that physician or a community health agent were twice more likely to be uninfected (probability = 0.60) than registered or aid nurse (probability = 0.28) when working less than 5.5 years in the primary care setting. In cross validation, the predictive accuracy was 68% [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 65 - 71], AUC was 62% (95%CI 58 - 66), specificity was 78% (95%CI 74 - 81), and sensitivity was 44% (95%CI 38 - 50).

CONCLUSION:

Despite the low predictive power of this model, CART allowed to identify subgroups with higher probability of having both tests negative. The inclusion of new information related to TBI risk may contribute to the construction of a model with greater predictive power using the same CART technique.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Rev Bras Epidemiol Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Rev Bras Epidemiol Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil