Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Beneficiaries of radical surgery among clinical complete responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.
Zhang, Shu; Zhang, Rong; Li, Rong-Zhen; Wang, Qiao-Xuan; Chang, Hui; Ding, Pei-Rong; Li, Li-Ren; Wu, Xiao-Jun; Chen, Gong; Zeng, Zhi-Fan; Xiao, Wei-Wei; Gao, Yuan-Hong.
Afiliação
  • Zhang S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang R; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li RZ; Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wang QX; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chang H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Ding PR; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li LR; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wu XJ; Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chen G; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zeng ZF; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Xiao WW; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Gao YH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Cancer Sci ; 112(9): 3607-3615, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34146368
This study aimed to identify patients who benefit from radical surgery among those with rectal cancer who achieved clinical complete response (cCR). Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC; stage II/III) who achieved cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) were included (n = 212). Univariate/multivariate Cox analysis was performed to validate predictors for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). A decision tree was generated using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to categorize patients into different risk stratifications. Total mesorectal excision (TME) was compared with the watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy in each risk group. Two molecular predicators of CEA and CA19-9 were selected to establish the RPA-based risk stratification, categorizing LARC patients into low-risk (n = 139; CA19-9 < 35 U/mL and CEA < 5 ng/mL) and high-risk (n = 73; CA19-9 ≥ 35 U/mL or CEA ≥5 ng/mL) groups. Superior 5-y DMFS was observed in the low-risk group vs. the high-risk group (92.9% vs. 76.2%, P = .002). Low-risk LARC patients who underwent TME had significantly improved 5-y DMFS compared with their counterparts receiving the W&W strategy (95.9% vs. 84.3%; P = .028). No significant survival difference was observed in high-risk patients receiving the 2 treatment modalities (77.9% vs. 94.1%; P = .143). LARC patients with cCR who had both baseline CA19-9 < 35 U/mL and CEA < 5 ng/mL may benefit from radical surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Reto / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Reto / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China