Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study.
Keeley, Jared W; Briken, Peer; Evans, Spencer C; First, Michael B; Klein, Verena; Krueger, Richard B; Matsumoto, Chihiro; Fresán, Ana; Rebello, Tahilia J; Robles, Rebeca; Sharan, Pratap; Reed, Geoffrey M.
Afiliação
  • Keeley JW; Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: jwkeeley@vcu.edu.
  • Briken P; Institute for Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Evans SC; University of Miami, Department of Psychology, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
  • First MB; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
  • Klein V; Institute for Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatry University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Krueger RB; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
  • Matsumoto C; Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Fresán A; National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muniz, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Rebello TJ; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
  • Robles R; National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muniz, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Sharan P; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, New Delhi, India.
  • Reed GM; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA; World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Sex Med ; 18(9): 1592-1606, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373211
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The diagnosis of paraphilic disorder is a complicated clinical judgment based on the integration of information from multiple dimensions to arrive at a categorical (present/absent) conclusion. The recent update of the guidelines for paraphilic disorders in ICD-11 presents an opportunity to investigate how mental health professionals use the diagnostic guidelines to arrive at a diagnosis which thereby can optimize the guidelines for clinical use.

AIM:

This study examined clinicians' ability to use the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders which contain multiple dimensions that must be simultaneously assessed to arrive at a diagnosis.

METHODS:

The study investigated the ability of 1,263 international clinicians to identify the dimensions of paraphilic disorder in the context of written case vignettes that varied on a single dimension only.

OUTCOMES:

Participants provided diagnoses for the case vignettes along with dimensional ratings of the degree of presence of five dimensions of paraphilic disorder (arousal, consent, action, distress, and risk).

RESULTS:

Across a series of analyses, clinicians demonstrated a clear ability to recognize and appropriately integrate the dimensions of paraphilic disorders; however, there was some evidence that clinicians may over-diagnose non-pathological cases. CLINICAL TRANSLATION Clinicians would likely benefit from targeted training on the ICD-11 definition of paraphilic disorder and should be cautious of over-diagnosing. STRENGTHS AND

LIMITATIONS:

This study represents a large international sample of health professionals and is the first to examine clinicians' ability to apply the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders. Important limitations include not generalizing to all clinicians and acknowledging that results may be different in direct clinical interactions vs written case vignettes.

CONCLUSION:

These results indicate that clinicians appear capable of interpreting and implementing the diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders in ICD-11. Keeley JW, Briken P, Evans SC, et al. Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study. J Sex Med 2021;181592-1606.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos Parafílicos / Classificação Internacional de Doenças Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Sex Med Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos Parafílicos / Classificação Internacional de Doenças Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Sex Med Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article