Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of nasal dilator strips on measures of sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy.
Maxwell, Mariko; Sanapo, Laura; Monteiro, Kristina; Bublitz, Maggie; Avalos, Ashanti; Habr, Naya; Bourjeily, Ghada.
Afiliação
  • Maxwell M; Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Sanapo L; Women's Medicine Collaborative, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Monteiro K; Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Bublitz M; Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Avalos A; Women's Medicine Collaborative, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Habr N; Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Bourjeily G; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 18(2): 477-483, 2022 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34432628
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVES:

Women with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in pregnancy are at a greater risk of developing serious adverse perinatal outcomes. However, the pathogenesis of SDB in pregnancy is poorly understood. As nasal congestion is common in pregnancy, nasal obstruction may contribute to SDB in this population. This study aims to assess the impact of nasal dilator strips (NDS) on measures of SDB and their potential for use as a placebo condition.

METHODS:

Pregnant women ≥ 18 years old, body mass index ≥ 27 kg/m2, and habitual snoring were enrolled. Participants completed 2 consecutive level III home sleep apnea tests and used NDS during the second test. Objective measures including respiratory event index and pulse transit time drop index, a measure of increased arterial stiffness, were compared across tests. Subjective assessments of participants' perceived impact of NDS use was also obtained.

RESULTS:

54 women, 59% White, 60% in the third trimester were enrolled. Median time between the 2 studies was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR] 4). There was no significant change between the night without NDS use and the night with NDS use in respiratory event index (5.30 [IQR 6.20] vs 4.80 [IQR 6.78], P = .8) or pulse transit time drop index (6.8 [IQR 13.3] vs 6.6 [IQR 15.8], P = .360). Subjective measures of sleep did not differ between the 2 nights.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite the high prevalence of pregnancy-associated rhinitis, NDS do not have a significant impact on measures of SDB. Results from this study support the use of NDS as an appropriate placebo in prenatal clinical trials. CITATION Maxwell M, Sanapo L, Monteiro K, et al. Impact of nasal dilator strips on measures of sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(2)477-483.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes da Apneia do Sono Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Sleep Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes da Apneia do Sono Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Sleep Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article