Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of mechanical traction in supine versus prone lying position for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Khan, Rehan Ramzan; Riaz, Saima; Rashid, Sajid; Sulman, Muhammad.
Afiliação
  • Khan RR; Dr. Rehan Ramzan Khan, MSPT-OMPT. Assistant Professor, Multan College of Physiotherapy, Multan Medical and Dental College (MMDC), Multan, Pakistan.
  • Riaz S; Dr. Saima Riaz, MSPT-OMPT, PhD Assistant Professor, Riphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University (RIU), Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Rashid S; Prof. Dr. Sajid Rashid, PhD. Multan College of Physiotherapy, Multan Medical and Dental College (MMDC), Multan, Pakistan.
  • Sulman M; Dr. Muhammad Sulman, MSPT-OMPT. Senior Lecturer, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci ; 37(5): 1451-1455, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34475929
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of mechanical traction in supine versus prone lying position for lumbosacral radiculopathy. METHODS: A quasi experimental trial was conducted from April to September 2020 among sixty patients of chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy at Ibn e Siena Hospital, Multan. Participants were divided into two groups. Group-A (Supine) participants received lumbar traction in supine lying along with conventional treatment. Group-B (Prone) underwent the same treatment except the lumbar traction being applied in prone lying position. Participants were evaluated twice: at pre- treatment (week 0) and at the post treatment (week 2). Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale were used as outcome measure. Data was analyzed on SPSS 23. RESULTS: The mean (±S.D) age of the patients was 39±5.7 vs. 40±5.3 years in supine vs. prone group respectively. Mean ODI score was 25.2±6.13 vs. 26.0±6.26 at the start of treatment in supine vs. prone position respectively while it was 19.45±7.12 vs. 11.05±4.40 at end of treatment in supine vs. prone position respectively. Mean NPRS score was 7.73±1.23 vs. 7.67±0.96 at start of treatment in supine vs. prone position respectively while it was 4.63±0.89 vs. 3.13±0.90 at the end of treatment in supine vs. prone position respectively. CONCLUSION: Lumbar traction in prone lying position is more effective than lumbar traction in supine lying position for the treatment of chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pak J Med Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Paquistão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pak J Med Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Paquistão