Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: meta-analysis.
Kabir, Tousif; Tan, Zoe Z; Syn, Nicholas L; Wu, Eric; Lin, J Daryl; Zhao, Joseph J; Tan, Alvin Y H; Hui, Yong; Kam, Juinn H; Goh, Brian K P.
Afiliação
  • Kabir T; Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Tan ZZ; Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Syn NL; Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Wu E; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.
  • Lin JD; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.
  • Zhao JJ; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.
  • Tan AYH; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.
  • Hui Y; Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Kam JH; Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Goh BKP; Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Br J Surg ; 109(1): 21-29, 2021 12 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34757385
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The exact role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying liver cirrhosis (LC) is not well defined. In this meta-analysis, both long- and short-term outcomes following LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) were analysed.

METHODS:

PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched systematically for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score matched (PSM) studies reporting outcomes of LLR versus OLR of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). This was analysed using one-stage (individual participant data meta-analysis) and two-stage (aggregate data meta-analysis) approaches. Secondary outcomes were operation duration, blood loss, blood transfusion, Pringle manoeuvre utilization, overall and major complications, length of hospital stay (LOHS), 90-day mortality and R0 resection rates.

RESULTS:

Eleven studies comprising 1618 patients (690 LLR versus 928 OLR) were included for analysis. In the one-stage meta-analysis, an approximately 18.7 per cent lower hazard rate (HR) of death in the LLR group (random effects HR 0.81, 95 per cent confidence interval [C.I.] 0.68 to 0.96; P = 0.018) was observed. Two-stage meta-analysis resulted in a pooled HR of 0.84 (95 per cent C.I. 0.74 to 0.96; P = 0.01) in the overall LLR cohort. This indicated a 16-26 per cent reduction in the HR of death for patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent LLR. For secondary outcomes, LLR was associated with less blood loss (mean difference [MD] -99 ml, 95 per cent C.I. -182 to -16 ml), reduced overall complications (odds ratio 0.49, 95 per cent C.I. 0.37 to 0.66) and major complications (odds ratio 0.45, 95 per cent C.I. 0.26 to 0.79), and shorter LOHS (MD -3.22 days, 95 per cent C.I. -4.38 to -2.06 days).

CONCLUSION:

Laparoscopic resection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis is associated with improved survival and perioperative outcomes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Cirrose Hepática / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Singapura

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Cirrose Hepática / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Singapura