Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cash transfers and the mental health of young people: Evidence from South Africa's child support grant.
Garman, E C; Eyal, K; Avendano, M; Evans-Lacko, S; Lund, C.
Afiliação
  • Garman EC; Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: emily.garman@uct.ac.za.
  • Eyal K; School of Economics, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Avendano M; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Evans-Lacko S; Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
  • Lund C; Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa; Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's Global Health Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience,
Soc Sci Med ; 292: 114631, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34891031
ABSTRACT
This study examines the longitudinal impact of the South African Child Support Grant (CSG) on risk for depression and life satisfaction among young people (15-19 years). We analysed data from the last three waves of the National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS), a nationally representative panel survey that took place every two years from 2008 to 2017. We used an instrumental variable (IV) approach that exploits multiple changes in age eligibility from 1998 to 2012. Depressive symptoms were assessed using an 8-item version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; participants who scored above 8 were considered at risk for depression. Life satisfaction was rated on a scale of 1 ('very dissatisfied') to 10 ('very satisfied'); participants who scored 8 or above were classified as satisfied. We also examined impacts on educational deficit (≥2 years behind) and not being in education, employment or training (NEET) as secondary outcomes, as these are also important for mental health. Age eligibility strongly predicted CSG receipt at Wave 3. In instrumental variable models, CSG receipt did not influence the risk for depression (ß = 0.10, SE = 0.10, p = 0.316), nor life satisfaction (ß = -0.07, SE = 0.09, p = 0.420) at Wave 3, nor at Waves 4 or 5. Some improvements in educational deficit were observed at Wave 3 among CSG beneficiaries compared to non-beneficiaries. These results were robust to multiple specifications. CSG receipt did not improve the psychological wellbeing of adolescents and young adults, nor did it improve their education or employment outcomes. Our findings highlight the need to identify alternative social policies that address the root causes of youth social disadvantage, in conjunction with targeted approaches to improve the mental health of young South Africans living in poverty.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Custódia da Criança / Saúde Mental Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Custódia da Criança / Saúde Mental Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article