Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of Corticosteroid Use on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
Sieber, Alexis; Aberra, Faten N; Bonhomme, Brittaney; McKeever, Liam; Lewis, James D.
Afiliação
  • Sieber A; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Aberra FN; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Bonhomme B; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • McKeever L; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lewis JD; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. James.Lewis@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(11): 5168-5176, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35094254
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids (CS) are widely used to treat Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), but are not recommended as maintenance therapy. Biologic drugs are widely used as an alternative to or in conjunction with CS to induce and maintain remission. This meta-analysis tested the hypothesis that CS use is associated with differential response to biologics. METHODS: We identified published placebo-controlled clinical trials of biologic drugs approved for the treatment of CD or UC. Pooled estimates of the risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals were derived from random effects models for induction of response and remission and maintenance of remission comparing biologic with CS versus biologic alone. Heterogeneity of response was estimated using I2. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled estimates of the RD and I2 comparing biologic plus CS versus biologic alone were as follows: induction of UC response 0.15 (0.05, 0.25), I2 = 57.29% and CD response 0.02 (- 0.03, 0.06), I2 = 0.01%; induction of UC remission 0.03 (- 0.01, 0.08), I2 = 0.00% and CD remission 0.08(0.02, 0.14), I2 = 7.81%; and maintenance of UC remission - 0.06 (- 0.13, 0.01), I2 = 0.00% and CD remission - 0.06 (- 0.14, 0.03), I2 = 11.24%. Patients in the placebo arm of CD trials who were receiving CS were less likely to achieve remission during the induction phase (pooled RD - 0.05 (- 0.09, - 0.00), I2 = 0.00%). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials, CS use was associated with higher biologic response rates for UC and remission rates for CD during the induction phase, but were not associated with improved maintenance of remission.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais / Colite Ulcerativa / Doença de Crohn Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Produtos Biológicos / Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais / Colite Ulcerativa / Doença de Crohn Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos