Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of continuous with single-injection regional analgesia on patient experience after ambulatory orthopaedic surgery: a randomised multicentre trial.
Maurice-Szamburski, Axel; Grillo, Philippe; Cuvillon, Philippe; Gazeau, Thierry; Delaunay, Laurent; Auquier, Pascal; Bringuier, Sophie; Capdevila, Xavier.
Afiliação
  • Maurice-Szamburski A; Clinique Juge, Marseille, France. Electronic address: amszamburski@gmail.com.
  • Grillo P; Clinique Juge, Marseille, France.
  • Cuvillon P; CHU Nîmes Caremeau, Nîmes, France.
  • Gazeau T; Clinique Jules Vernes, Nantes, France.
  • Delaunay L; Clinique Générale, Annecy, France.
  • Auquier P; Laboratoire de Santé Publique, EA3279, Marseille, France.
  • Bringuier S; Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
  • Capdevila X; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Lapeyronie University Hospital, and Montpellier NeuroSciences Institute, Inserm U 1051, Montpellier, France.
Br J Anaesth ; 129(3): 435-444, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35811140
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The optimal approach to improving patient experience and analgesia after ambulatory orthopaedic surgery remains unclear.

METHODS:

This multicentre, randomised clinical trial compared single-injection nerve block analgesia with home delivery of continuous nerve block analgesia by remote-controlled electronic pump. The primary outcome was patient-reported satisfaction (Evaluation du Vecu de l'Anesthesie Generale [EVAN-G]; 0-100) assessed on postoperative Day 2. Secondary outcomes focused on pain, opioid consumption, quality of rehabilitation, activity tracking using a wearable electronic device, and 90-day quality of life.

RESULTS:

We randomly assigned 294 patients to continuous pump delivery or single injection. For subjects with normal level of pain catastrophising (Pain Catastrophizing Scale <30; n=211), median global EVAN-G was higher with the electronic pump compared with the single injection (78 [69-86] vs 72 [63-84]; P=0.03), as were pain satisfaction scores (P=0.01). For the maximum pain levels, the numerical rating scale score was 2.0 (1.0-5.0) in the electronic-pump group vs 5.0 (3.0-7.0) in the single-injection group on the first 2 days after surgery (P<0.0001). Total opioid consumption in morphine equivalent was higher with single injection (mean [standard deviation]) 70.5 [73.8] vs 31.9 [54.2] mg; P<0.01). The groups did not differ in early rehabilitation on Day 1 or quality of life on Day 45. Electronic activity tracking indicated higher activity in the electronic-pump group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Self-reported patient satisfaction at home was better with continuous nerve block analgesia via electronic pump vs single injection, without impairing early rehabilitation. Single-injection analgesia was associated with higher pain levels and opioid consumption and lower satisfaction. Patient catastrophising negatively affected the experience of pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02720965.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Analgesia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Ortopédicos / Analgesia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article