Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modular Augmentation in Varus-Valgus-Constrained Knee Arthroplasty-Do We Need Sleeves to Avoid Femoral Loosening After Excessive Distal Augmentation?
Lazic, Igor; Pohlig, Florian; Haug, Alexander T; Suren, Christian; Langer, Severin; Prodinger, Peter M.
Afiliação
  • Lazic I; Technische Universität München, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, München, Germany.
  • Pohlig F; Technische Universität München, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, München, Germany.
  • Haug AT; Technische Universität München, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, München, Germany.
  • Suren C; Technische Universität München, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, München, Germany.
  • Langer S; Technische Universität München, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, München, Germany.
  • Prodinger PM; Technische Universität München, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, München, Germany; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Krankenhaus Agatharied, Hausham, Germany.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(12): 2394-2398, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35843377
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In revision total knee arthroplasty, zonal fixation methods with a combination of augments, press-fit stems, and sleeves are popular. We hypothesized that high distal femoral augmentation with diaphyseal press-fit stems leads to an increased rate of early aseptic loosening and that femoral metaphyseal sleeves improve implant survival. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated implant survival in relation to augment heights and sleeves.

METHODS:

A total of 136 patients with mean clinical follow-up of 50 months (range, 28-85) who underwent modular total knee arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty with semiconstrained implants between January 2012 and July 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Implant survival with 4, 8, and 12 mm distal femoral augments was compared to no distal augmentation. Subsequently, a subgroup analysis was performed for femoral sleeve implantation.

RESULTS:

We observed an implant survival rate of 97.0%, 87.5%, and 69.2% for 4, 8, and 12 mm distal femoral augmentation, respectively (P = .73; P = .19; P = .008). The implant survival rate with femoral sleeves was 95.8% for the 8 mm augments and 85.7% for the 12 mm augments (P = .42; P = .96). Without femoral sleeves, the implant survival rate was 78.3% with the 8 mm augments and 50.0% with the 12 mm augments (P = .02; P < .001).

CONCLUSION:

Higher rates of aseptic femoral loosening were identified for distal femoral augmentation of 8 mm or more without metaphyseal sleeve fixation in semiconstrained implants. Thus, in cases with femoral metaphyseal bone damage requiring high distal femoral augmentation, metaphyseal sleeves should be used to avoid early aseptic femoral loosening.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha