Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning classification of breeding protocol descriptions from Canadian Holsteins.
Alcantara, L M; Schenkel, F S; Lynch, C; Oliveira Junior, G A; Baes, C F; Tulpan, D.
Afiliação
  • Alcantara LM; Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Schenkel FS; Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada. Electronic address: schenkel@uoguelph.ca.
  • Lynch C; Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Oliveira Junior GA; Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Baes CF; Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada; Institute of Genetics, Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, University of Bern, Bern, 3001, Switzerland.
  • Tulpan D; Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
J Dairy Sci ; 105(10): 8177-8188, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055841
Dairy farmers are motivated to ensure cows become pregnant in an optimal and timely manner. Although timed artificial insemination (TAI) is a successful management tool in dairy cattle, it masks an animal's innate fertility performance, likely reducing the accuracy of genetic evaluations for fertility traits. Therefore, separating fertility traits based on the recorded management technique involved in the breeding process or adding the breeding protocol as an effect to the model can be viable approaches to address the potential bias caused by such management decisions. Nevertheless, there is a lack of specificity and uniformity in the recording of breeding protocol descriptions by dairy farmers. Therefore, this study investigated the use of 8 supervised machine learning algorithms to classify 1,835 unique breeding protocol descriptions from 981 herds into the following 2 classes: TAI or other than TAI. Our results showed that models that used a stacking classifier algorithm had the highest Matthews correlation coefficient (0.94 ± 0.04, mean ± SD) and maximized precision and recall (F1-score = 0.96 ± 0.03) on test data. Nonetheless, their F1-scores on test data were not different from 5 out of the other 7 algorithms considered. Altogether, results presented herein suggest machine learning algorithms can be used to produce robust models that correctly identify TAI protocols from dairy cattle breeding records, thus opening the opportunity for unbiased genetic evaluation of animals based on their natural fertility.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inseminação Artificial / Fertilidade Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inseminação Artificial / Fertilidade Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá