Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
Vanstraelen, Stijn; Coosemans, Willy; Depypere, Lieven; Mandeville, Yannick; Moons, Johnny; Van Veer, Hans; Nafteux, Philippe.
Afiliação
  • Vanstraelen S; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Coosemans W; Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism, and Aging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Depypere L; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Mandeville Y; Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism, and Aging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Moons J; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Van Veer H; Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism, and Aging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Nafteux P; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dis Esophagus ; 36(5)2023 Apr 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222069
Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is one of the most feared complications, which results in increased morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a powered circular stapler on complications after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer. Between May 2019 and July 2021, all consecutive oesophagectomies for cancer with intrathoracic anastomosis in a high-volume center were included in this retrospective study. Surgeons were free to choose either a manual or a powered circular stapler. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative complications were recorded in a prospective database, according to EsoData. Propensity score matching (age, body mass index, Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance and neoadjuvant therapy) was conducted to reduce potential confounding. We included 128 patients. Powered and manual circular staplers were used in 62 and 66 patients, respectively. Fewer anastomotic leakages were observed with the powered stapler group (OR = 7.3 (95%CI: 1.58-33.7); [3.2% (n = 2) vs 19.7% (n = 13), respectively; p = 0.004]). After propensity score matching, this remained statistically significant (OR = 8.5 (95%CI: 1.80-40.1); [4.1% (n = 2) vs 20.4% (n = 10), respectively; p = 0.013]). Additionally, anastomotic diameter was significantly higher with the powered stapler (median: 29 mm (63.3%) vs 25 mm (57.1%), respectively; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in comprehensive complication index (p = 0.146). A decreased mean length of stay was observed in the powered stapler group (11.1 vs 18.7 days respectively; p = 0.022). Postoperative anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection was significantly reduced after the introduction of the powered circular stapler, consequently resulting in a reduced length of stay. Further evaluation on long-term strictures and quality of life are warranted to support these results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dis Esophagus Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dis Esophagus Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica