Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mitigating inequalities at a large COVID-19 vaccination centre.
Taplin, Samantha; Andrews-Jones, Belinda; Chainey, Anna; Das, Sudipto; Dawson, Dawn; Dean, Andrew; Harvey, Kate; Holloway, John; King, Natasha; Pennell, Brett; Southgate, Cara; Warn, Jill; Sethi, Faisil.
Afiliação
  • Taplin S; Health Education England Wessex, Winchester, UK and Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Andrews-Jones B; Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, London, UK.
  • Chainey A; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Das S; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Dawson D; therapies and quality, Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Dean A; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Harvey K; Southampton City Council, Southampton, UK.
  • Holloway J; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • King N; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Pennell B; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Southgate C; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Warn J; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
  • Sethi F; Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Future Healthc J ; 9(3): 321-325, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36561817
Introduction: The COVID-19 vaccination service is a key component in the UK approach to reducing disease morbidity and mortality. Groups within the population at increased risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 overlap with groups that are less likely to take up the offer of vaccination. This article outlines some learning from approaches within a large vaccination centre in the UK to reduce inequalities. Solution: Continuous quality improvement processes were used to operationalise the mitigations to inequalities with vaccination uptake that were identified by a systematic equality impact assessment framework and continuous service feedback. Outcome: Quality improvement processes and community engagement enabled tailored mitigations to vaccination uptake. Engagement with community ambassadors strengthened community relationships and the co-creation of bespoke sessions encouraged vaccination uptake within specific groups. Conclusion: Recommendations for strengthening approaches to inequality reduction include having a systematic framework for assessment and mitigation of inequalities, embedding quality improvement, identifying resources, and taking a collaborative and co-design approach to services with underserved groups.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Future Healthc J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Future Healthc J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article