Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective quantitative risk assessment of skin sensitization caused by an antimicrobial agent used in a consumer product: 2,3,5,6-Tetrachloro-4-(methylsulfonyl) pyridine.
Fukushima, Asako; Morioka, Hisako; Kobayashi, Toshio; Katagiri, Ritsuko; Tanabe, Aiko; Sakunaga, Mayumi; Takeyoshi, Masahiro.
Afiliação
  • Fukushima A; Chemicals Assessment and Research Center, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Morioka H; CERI Hita, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan, Hita-shi, Oita, Japan.
  • Kobayashi T; CERI Hita, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan, Hita-shi, Oita, Japan.
  • Katagiri R; Chemicals Assessment and Research Center, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Tanabe A; Chemicals Assessment and Research Center, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sakunaga M; Chemicals Assessment and Research Center, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Takeyoshi M; Chemicals Assessment and Research Center, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(5): 395-401, 2023 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36807334
BACKGROUND: Serious cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by exposure to 3,5,6-tetrachloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine (TCMSP; CAS no. 13108-52-6) used as an antimicrobial agent for desk mats have been reported in Japan. OBJECTIVE: A quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of TCMSP contained in desk mats was performed retrospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA was conducted to determine a reliable EC1.6 value for TCMSP. The acceptable exposure level (AEL) for TCMSP was derived from the EC1.6 value by applying sensitization assessment factors (SAFs). The exposure level was estimated based on the assumption referring to the use conditions of thiabendazole in the same purpose. Then, the estimated exposure level was compared with the AEL to evaluate the skin sensitization risk. RESULTS: The AEL was calculated as 0.00458 µg/cm2 based on the EC1.6 value (0.011%, 2.75 µg/cm2 ) by applying a composite SAF of 600. The estimated TCMSP exposure level from the desk mat was 500 times greater than the AEL, indicating a serious skin sensitization risk. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments of skin sensitization potencies of chemicals to be used in consumer products are strongly recommended, and QRAs should be performed at the pre-marketing stage to avoid the skin sensitization risk in consumers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Alérgica de Contato / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Alérgica de Contato / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão