Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Olaparib efficacy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Subgroup analyses from the phase III OlympiAD trial.
Senkus, Elzbieta; Delaloge, Suzette; Domchek, Susan M; Conte, Pierfranco; Im, Seock-Ah; Xu, Binghe; Armstrong, Anne; Masuda, Norikazu; Fielding, Anitra; Robson, Mark; Tung, Nadine.
Afiliação
  • Senkus E; Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
  • Delaloge S; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Domchek SM; Basser Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Conte P; University of Padova and Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
  • Im SA; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Xu B; National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Armstrong A; Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Masuda N; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Fielding A; Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Robson M; AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
  • Tung N; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Int J Cancer ; 153(4): 803-814, 2023 08 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971103
In the primary analysis of the phase III OlympiAD trial, olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We report subgroup analyses for the final analysis at a median OS follow-up of 18.9 months (olaparib) and 15.5 months (TPC). Patients (N = 302) with gBRCAm, HER2-negative mBC and ≤2 previous lines of chemotherapy for mBC were randomized 2:1 to open-label olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or TPC. All subgroup analyses were prespecified except site of metastases. Investigator-assessed median PFS was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-8.4; 176/205 events) for olaparib and 3.8 months (95% CI 2.8-4.2; 83/97 events) for TPC (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.39-0.66). In subgroup analyses, median PFS hazard ratios (95% CI) favored olaparib: hormone receptor status (triple-negative: 0.47, 0.32-0.69; hormone receptor-positive: 0.52, 0.36-0.75); gBRCAm (BRCA1: 0.49, 0.35-0.71; BRCA2: 0.49, 0.33-0.74); site of metastases (visceral/CNS: 0.53, 0.40-0.71; non-visceral: 0.45, 0.23-0.98); prior chemotherapy for mBC (yes: 0.51, 0.38-0.70; no: 0.49, 0.30-0.82); prior platinum-based chemotherapy for BC (yes: 0.49, 0.30-0.83; no: 0.50, 0.37-0.69); progressive disease at randomization (yes: 0.48, 0.35-0.65; no: 0.61, 0.36-1.07). Investigator-assessed objective response rates were higher across all subgroups with olaparib (35-68%) vs TPC (5-40%). Global health status/health-related quality of life increased in all subgroups with olaparib vs decreased/no change with TPC. These data confirm the consistency of olaparib benefit across patient subgroups in OlympiAD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Polônia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Polônia