Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cochlear Implantation in Pediatrics: The Effect of Cochlear Coverage.
Alothman, Noura; Almuhawas, Fida; Badghaish, Reem; Alotaibi, Al Hanouf; Alhabib, Salman F; Alzhrani, Farid; Hagr, Abdulrahman.
Afiliação
  • Alothman N; Health Communication Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 84428, Saudi Arabia.
  • Almuhawas F; King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia.
  • Badghaish R; King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alotaibi AH; King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alhabib SF; King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alzhrani F; King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia.
  • Hagr A; King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia.
J Pers Med ; 13(3)2023 Mar 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36983743
ABSTRACT
The effect of insertion depth and position of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays on speech perception remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the relationship between cochlear coverage and speech performance in children with prelingual hearing loss with CI. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) and speech audiometry, including speech reception threshold (SRT) using spondee words and speech discrimination score (SDS) using phonetically balanced monosyllabic words, were tested. The Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales were also used. Thirty-one ears were implanted with the FLEX 28 electrode array, and 54 with the FORM 24 were included in the current study. For the studied ear, the mean cochlear duct length was 30.82 ± 2.24 mm; the mean cochlear coverage was 82.78 ± 7.49%. Cochlear coverage was a significant negative predictor for the mean pure tone threshold across frequecnies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (PTA4) (p = 0.019). Cochlear coverage was a significant positive predictor of SDS (p = 0.009). In children with cochlear coverage ≥ 82.78%, SDS was significantly better than in those with coverage < 82.78% (p = 0.04). Cochlear coverage was not a significant predictor of the SRT, CAP, or SIR. In conclusion, the cochlear coverage of the CI electrode array has an impact on the users' SDS. Further long-term studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to address the most critical factors affecting CI recipients' outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pers Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Arábia Saudita

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pers Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Arábia Saudita