Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attitudes towards diversity, equity, and inclusion across the CTSA Programs: Strong but not uniform support and commitment.
Duong, Jeffrey; McIntosh, Scott; Attia, Jacqueline; Michener, J Lloyd; Cottler, Linda B; Aguilar-Gaxiola, Sergio A.
Afiliação
  • Duong J; Center for Reducing Health Disparities, University of California - Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • McIntosh S; Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Attia J; Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Michener JL; Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Cottler LB; Department of Epidemiology, Colleges of Public Health and Health Professions and Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Aguilar-Gaxiola SA; Center for Reducing Health Disparities, University of California - Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 7(1): e66, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37008605
Background: This study describes attitudes towards diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) among members of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program. It also explores associations between program members' roles and their perceived importance of and commitment to improving DEI and assesses the link between perceived importance of and commitment to improving DEI. Lastly, it ascertains barriers and priorities concerning health equity research, workforce development, CTSA consortium leadership, and clinical trials participation among respondents. Methods: A survey was administered to registrants of the virtual CTSA Program 2020 Fall Meeting. Respondents reported their roles, perceived importance of and commitment to improving DEI. Bivariate cross-tabulations and structural equation modeling examined associations between respondents' roles, perceived importance of DEI, and commitment to improving DEI. Grounded theory was used to code and analyze open-ended questions. Results: Among 796 registrants, 231 individuals completed the survey. DEI was "extremely important" among 72.7 percent of respondents and lowest among UL1 PIs (66.7%). Being "extremely committed" to improving DEI was reported by 56.3 percent of respondents and lowest among "other staff" (49.6%). Perceived importance of DEI was positively associated with commitment to improve DEI. Institutional and CTSA Commitment, Support, and Prioritization of DEI represented a key theme for improving DEI among respondents. Conclusion: Clinical and translational science organizations must take bold steps to transform individual perceptions of DEI into commitment and commitment into action. Institutions must set visionary objectives spanning leadership, training, research, and clinical trials research to meet the promise and benefits of a diverse NIH-supported workforce.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos