Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of a smoke-free beaches intervention in Barcelona: a quasi-experimental study.
Valmayor, Sara; González, Kilian; López, Maria J; Lacera, Patricia; Giménez, Patricia; Rumín-Caparrós, Aitor; Pasarín, Maria Isabel; Henderson, Elisabet; Díez, Elia.
Afiliação
  • Valmayor S; Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain svalmayo@aspb.cat.
  • González K; Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • López MJ; Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Lacera P; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
  • Giménez P; Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Rumín-Caparrós A; BCASA, Barcelona Cicle de l'Aigua, SA, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Pasarín MI; Medi Ambient i Serveis Urbans - Ecologia Urbana, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Henderson E; BCASA, Barcelona Cicle de l'Aigua, SA, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Díez E; Medi Ambient i Serveis Urbans - Ecologia Urbana, Barcelona, Spain.
Tob Control ; 2023 Jul 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37402576
BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the effect of a smoke-free beaches (SFB) intervention in Barcelona on smoking during the 2021 bathing season. METHODS: Quasi-experimental pre-post design (pre-intervention period: 15-28 May; post-intervention period: 29 May-12 September). Based on users' profiles and location, four beaches were assigned to the intervention group (IG) and five to the comparison group (CG). The intervention involved: a mayoral decree (29 May), a communication campaign and beach on-site information. We established two 3 m × 3 m transects per beach from the coastline to the promenade. Trained teams collected smoking-related information in the transects through observations and surveys to beach users. Outcomes are as follows: percentage of people reporting witnessing smoking behaviours the last fortnight and percentage of people observed smoking. We calculated and compared prevalence ratios (PRs) with adjusted Poisson regressions. RESULTS: 3751 interviews (1721 IG; 2030 CG) and 1108 observations (498 IG, 610 CG) were carried out. SFB were associated with a significant reduction in the percentage of people reporting witnessing smoking (IG (pre: 87.2%; post: 49.7%); CG (pre: 86.2%; post: 74.1%); PR (95% CI): 0.7 (0.6 to 0.8)); and in the users observed smoking in the beach (IG (pre: 3.8%; post: 3.0%); CG (pre: 2.3%; post: 9.9%); PR (95% CI): 0.3 (0.3 to 0.4)). Satisfaction scores were 8.3 (IG) and 8.1 (CG) out of 10. CONCLUSION: An SFB intervention is an effective and well-accepted measure to reduce smoking and smokers' visibility. Smoke-free measures should be extended to beaches and other non-regulated outdoor areas.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha