Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measurement Properties of Patient Reported Outcome Scales: A Systematic Review.
Stallwood, Emma; Elsman, Ellen B M; Monsour, Andrea; Baba, Ami; Butcher, Nancy J; Offringa, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Stallwood E; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Elsman EBM; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Monsour A; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Baba A; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Butcher NJ; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Offringa M; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pediatrics ; 152(2)2023 Aug 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37439131
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Recently a standard set for overall pediatric health outcomes in routine care was developed, which includes patient (or proxy) reported outcome measures (PROMs) for global health, cognitive functioning, and self-efficacy.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine whether the following PROMs have sufficient measurement properties to be used in pediatric routine care PROMIS Pediatric and Parent Proxy Scale - Global Health 7+2, PROMIS Parent Proxy Short Form - Cognitive Function 7a, and NIH Toolbox Self-Efficacy CAT Ages 13 to 17. DATA SOURCES Embase, Psych INFO, and Web of Science were searched from year of inception of each PROM to May 25, 2020; Medline to October 24, 2022. STUDY SELECTION English, full-text peer-reviewed articles that evaluated measurement properties of included PROMs were eligible. DATA EXTRACTION The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews was used to appraise eligible studies and synthesize the overall evidence.

RESULTS:

Screening >4000 titles yielded 4 to 6 eligible empirical studies for each PROM. The PROMIS instruments had sufficient content validity with low-quality evidence and at least low-quality evidence for sufficient structural validity and internal consistency. The NIH Toolbox lacked essential evidence for content validity.

LIMITATIONS:

Assessments of measurement properties were based on information reported in the included studies; underreporting might have led to less favorable ratings.

CONCLUSIONS:

The PROMIS instruments assessed in this review measure their intended construct for their targeted age group; clinicians can use these PROMs in pediatric routine care. Additional studies evaluating measurement properties, including content validity, are needed for the NIH Toolbox before it should be recommended for use in clinical practice.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Pediatrics Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Pediatrics Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá