Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Speech Outcomes Audit for Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate After 2-Stage Palate Repair: Preliminary Results.
Antoneli, Melissa Zattoni; Fukushiro, Ana Paula; Yamashita, Renata Paciello; Ozawa, Terumi Okada; Alonso, Nivaldo; Tonello, Cristiano.
Afiliação
  • Antoneli MZ; Department of Speech and Hearing, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies. University of São Paulo.
  • Fukushiro AP; Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies and Bauru School of Dentistry. University of São Paulo.
  • Yamashita RP; Laboratory of Physiology. Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies. University of São Paulo.
  • Ozawa TO; Department of Orthodontics, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies. University of São Paulo.
  • Alonso N; Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies and Hospital of Clinics of Medicine Faculty, University of São Paulo.
  • Tonello C; Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Craniofac Surg ; 34(6): 1772-1775, 2023 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37555517
ABSTRACT
Primary cleft lip and palate surgeries can interfere with speech status, facial appearance, maxillary growth, and psychosocial and academic development. Therefore, different surgical protocols and techniques have been proposed, and adequate velopharyngeal function and speech is the main goal for the treatment success. The present study aimed to report preliminary speech results of the 2-stage palate repair of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. One hundred seventy nonsyndromic patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate were included in this report, 35% males and 65% females, submitted to the 2-stage palatoplasty protocol, composed by lip, nasal ala, and hard palate repair at 3 to 6 m (stage 1) and soft palate repair at 12 to 18 m (stage 2). The target age range for speech recording was 5 to 10 years, and the speech material included repetition of Brazilian Portuguese sentences. These samples were obtained over 5 years and assessed by 3 of 14 experienced speech pathologists. When discordant, the majority rate was adopted. Average velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) rates were 19,5%, varying according to the soft palate technique, with better results when the Sommerlad technique was performed (VPD=11%), followed by Braithwaite (VPD=15%) and then Von Langenbeck (VPD=25%). Passive errors were observed in 32% and active errors in 25%. Speech results reflect the outcomes of an interdisciplinary team's work, where facial growth and nasolabial appearance must also be considered. Further analysis and a wider casuistic are recommended. Hence outcomes audit needs to be a permanent process, providing solid and updated evidence for optimal cleft care.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Insuficiência Velofaríngea / Fenda Labial / Fissura Palatina Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Insuficiência Velofaríngea / Fenda Labial / Fissura Palatina Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article