Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review.
Fastl, Christina; De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C; Babo Martins, Sara; Sucena Afonso, João; di Bari, Carlotta; Venkateswaran, Narmada; Pires, Sara Monteiro; Mughini-Gras, Lapo; Huntington, Ben; Rushton, Jonathan; Pigott, David; Devleesschauwer, Brecht.
Afiliação
  • Fastl C; Global Burden of Animal Diseases Programme, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • De Carvalho Ferreira HC; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Babo Martins S; Social sciences unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Merelbeke, Belgium.
  • Sucena Afonso J; Global Burden of Animal Diseases Programme, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • di Bari C; Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
  • Venkateswaran N; Global Burden of Animal Diseases Programme, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Pires SM; Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
  • Mughini-Gras L; Global Burden of Animal Diseases Programme, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Huntington B; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Rushton J; Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
  • Pigott D; Global Burden of Animal Diseases Programme, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Devleesschauwer B; Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Epidemiol Infect ; 151: e143, 2023 08 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37577944
ABSTRACT
Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigating the direct impact of animal sources, defined as livestock, aquaculture, pets, and animal-based food, on human AMR. We searched four scientific databases and identified 31 relevant publications, including 12 risk assessments, 16 source attribution studies, and three other studies. Most studies were published between 2012 and 2022, and most came from Europe and North America, but we also identified five articles from South and South-East Asia. The studies differed in their methodologies, conceptual approaches (bottom-up, top-down, and complex), definitions of the AMR hazard and outcome, the number and type of sources they addressed, and the outcome measures they reported. The most frequently addressed animal source was chicken, followed by cattle and pigs. Most studies investigated bacteria-resistance combinations. Overall, studies on the direct contribution of animal sources of AMR are rare but increasing. More recent publications tailor their methodologies increasingly towards the AMR hazard as a whole, providing grounds for future research to build on.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Bacterianas / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Infect Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Bacterianas / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Infect Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido