Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robust Radiomic Feature Selection in Digital Mammography: Understanding the Effect of Imaging Acquisition Physics Using Phantom and Clinical Data Analysis.
Acciavatti, Raymond J; Cohen, Eric A; Maghsoudi, Omid Haji; Gastounioti, Aimilia; Pantalone, Lauren; Hsieh, Meng-Kang; Conant, Emily F; Scott, Christopher G; Winham, Stacey J; Kerlikowske, Karla; Vachon, Celine; Maidment, Andrew D A; Kontos, Despina.
Afiliação
  • Acciavatti RJ; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
  • Cohen EA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
  • Maghsoudi OH; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
  • Gastounioti A; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
  • Pantalone L; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
  • Hsieh MK; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
  • Conant EF; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
  • Scott CG; Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester MN 55905.
  • Winham SJ; Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester MN 55905.
  • Kerlikowske K; UCSF Women's Health Clinical Research Center, 550 16 Street, San Francisco CA 94143.
  • Vachon C; Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester MN 55905.
  • Maidment ADA; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
  • Kontos D; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982014
Studies have shown that combining calculations of radiomic features with estimates of mammographic density results in an even better assessment of breast cancer risk than density alone. However, to ensure that risk assessment calculations are consistent across different imaging acquisition settings, it is important to identify features that are not overly sensitive to changes in these settings. In this study, digital mammography (DM) images of an anthropomorphic phantom ("Rachel", Gammex 169, Madison, WI) were acquired at various technique settings. We varied kV and mAs, which control contrast and noise, respectively. DM images in women with negative screening exams were also analyzed. Radiomic features were calculated in the raw ("FOR PROCESSING") DM images; i.e., grey-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. For each feature, the range of variation across technique settings in phantom images was calculated. This range was scaled against the range of variation in the clinical distribution (specifically, the range corresponding to the middle 90% of the distribution). In order for a radiomic feature to be considered robust, this metric of imaging acquisition variation (IAV) should be as small as possible (approaching zero). An IAV threshold of 0.25 was proposed for the purpose of this study. Out of 341 features, 284 features (83%) met the threshold IAV ≤ 0.25. In conclusion, we have developed a method to identify robust radiomic features in DM.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article