Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peripheral nerve stimulation for saphenous neuralgia.
McCullough, Meghan; Kenney, Deborah; Curtin, Catherine; Ottestad, Einar.
Afiliação
  • McCullough M; Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA Meghan.McCullough@cshs.org.
  • Kenney D; Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Curtin C; Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Ottestad E; Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 2023 Dec 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050145
BACKGROUND: Injury to saphenous nerve branches is frequent during knee surgery and can result in chronic pain. This saphenous neuralgia remains challenging to treat. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a new potential non-pharmacologic treatment option. We present our outcomes experience using this technology in 12 patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed PNS placement for saphenous neuralgia between 2000 and 2022 at a single institution. Demographic information was collected as well as response to the device. Four-question short-form Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores were collected before and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months postprocedure. Specific scores included pain interference and behavior, functional mobility, depression, anxiety, and sleep impairment. Change in pain interference measured by the short-form PROMIS tool at 6 months was chosen as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Twelve patients met inclusion criteria, with 10 patients having the full 6-month follow-up. In these 10 patients, the mean change from baseline in the short-form adjusted pain interference score (greater difference means improved pain) at 6 months was 5.8 (SD 6.5). Among all patients, average follow-up was 11.5 months (range 3-35 months). Most patients' symptoms developed after knee surgery (84%). Prior to PNS, patients underwent other treatments including cryoablation (8%), radiofrequency ablation (16%), saphenous neurectomy (16%), or surgical release of adjacent nerves (25%). Ten patients (83%) reported any improvement in symptoms while two reported no benefit. Complications occurred in four patients (33%). Two patients had the device removed and a third discontinued use. PROMIS Scores for pain, functional mobility, mood, and sleep impairment all improved. DISCUSSION: Limited effective treatments exist for saphenous neuralgia. Our case series demonstrates the potential of PNS as a treatment for saphenous neuralgia. Comparative effectiveness studies are warranted to assess whether our effect size is clinically relevant.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Reg Anesth Pain Med Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Reg Anesth Pain Med Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos