Long term all-cause mortality after myocardial infarction with non-obstructed vs obstructed coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of adjusted data.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The difference in the long-term outcomes of myocardial infarction in patients with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) and patients with myocardial infarction with obstructed coronary artery disease (MI-CAD) is not clear. The current study aimed to pool adjusted data to compare long-term outcomes of MINOCA vs MI-CAD. METHODS: Electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases was done for publications up to 18th June 2023. Only studies reporting multivariable-adjusted data with > 1 year of follow-up were included. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between MINOCA and MI-CAD patients (HR 0.90 95% CI 0.68, 1.19 I2 = 94% p = 0.48). Analysis of the limited data showed a reduced combined risk of all-cause mortality and MI (HR 0.54 95% CI 0.39, 0.76 I2 = 72% p = 0.003) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (HR 0.66 95% CI 0.51, 0.84 I2 = 51% p = 0.0009) in patients with MINOCA vs MI-CAD, and no difference in the risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.81 95% CI 0.54, 1.22 I2 = 0% p = 0.31) and readmission between the two groups (HR 0.85 95% CI 0.61, 1.19 I2 = 90% p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: A pooled analysis of adjusted outcomes from the available studies indicated that MINOCA and MI-CAD patients have similar long-term all-cause mortality risk. Our conclusions on the risk of cardiovascular mortality, MACE and readmission rates need to be taken with caution due to a lack of adequate studies. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence on this important subject.