Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost analysis of self-monitoring blood glucose in nonintensively managed type 2 diabetes.
Kerr, David; Duncan, Ian; Repetto, Enrico; Maroun, Rana; Wu, Alexander; Perkins, Christopher; Bergman, Gert; Giorgino, Francesco.
Afiliação
  • Kerr D; Diabetes Technology Society, 845 Malcolm Rd, Ste 5, Burlingame, CA 94010. Email: kerr@diabetestechnology.org.
Am J Manag Care ; 29(12): 670-675, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38170484
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs between self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) users in adults with nonintensively managed type 2 diabetes (T2D). STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective analysis of the MarketScan Databases.

METHODS:

Adults with T2D using SMBG or initiating CGM between January 2018 and March 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were (1) 2 consecutive claims for T2D or 1 claim for T2D and a claim for glucose-lowering therapy, (2) at least 1 pharmacy claim for SMBG strips or CGM sensors, and (3) continuous enrollment for 1 year before and after the index date. Individuals with evidence of CGM in the preindex period, pregnancy, use of rapid-acting insulin or glucagon, type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes, or secondary diabetes at any time during the study period were excluded. SMBG and CGM patients were matched using propensity score, and all-cause HCRU and costs during a 1-year period were compared.

RESULTS:

A total of 3498 patients were included in each matched cohort. The per-patient per-year (PPPY) all-cause cost was $20,542 in CGM users vs $19,349 in SMBG users (P < .001). The PPPY cost of glucose-lowering medication was $6312 in CGM users vs $5606 in SMBG users (P < .001). No significant differences in the number of emergency department visits or hospitalizations were observed, but CGM users had more all-cause outpatient visits and office visits with an endocrinologist.

CONCLUSIONS:

In adults with nonintensively managed T2D, SMBG appears to be less costly than CGM and is associated with lower pharmacy costs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Manag Care Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Manag Care Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article