Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A single centre experience on the formation of double barrelled uro-colostomy in pelvic exenteration surgery: a cohort study.
Limmer, Alexandra M; Lendzion, Rebecca J; Leung, Christopher; Wong, Eddy; Gilmore, Andrew J.
Afiliação
  • Limmer AM; Complex Pelvic Surgery Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lendzion RJ; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Leung C; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Wong E; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, The University of Sydney, Concord Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gilmore AJ; Complex Pelvic Surgery Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
ANZ J Surg ; 94(6): 1161-1166, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193615
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Double barrelled uro-colostomy (DBUC) is an alternative to traditional ileal conduit (IC) and separate colostomy in patients requiring simultaneous urinary and faecal diversion for reconstruction in pelvic exenteration surgery (PES).

METHODS:

This cohort study evaluated short- and long-term morbidity and mortality associated with DBUC formation in 20 consecutive adult patients undergoing PES in an Australian Complex Pelvic Surgical Unit. Data were obtained from a prospective database.

RESULTS:

Mean age 59 years (range 27-76 years). PES was performed for malignant disease in 18 patients (curative intent in 17). Mean operative duration 11.8 h (range 7-17 h). Mean follow-up duration 29.1 months (range 2.6-90.1 months). Early DBUC-related complications occurred in four patients (20.0%) urinary tract infection (UTI)/urosepsis (n = 4) and early ureteric stenosis requiring intervention (n = 1). Late DBUC-related complications occurred in five patients (25.0%) recurrent UTI/urosepsis (n = 4), chronic kidney disease (n = 4), ureteric stenosis (n = 2) and parastomal hernia (n = 4). No mortality occurred secondary to a DBUC complication.

CONCLUSION:

DBUC is a safe reconstructive option with acceptable morbidity profile in patients requiring simultaneous urinary and faecal diversion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exenteração Pélvica / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Derivação Urinária / Colostomia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: ANZ J Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exenteração Pélvica / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Derivação Urinária / Colostomia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: ANZ J Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália