Association of Mean Upper Cervical Spinal Cord Cross-Sectional Area With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Community-Based Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the mean upper cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area (MUCCA) and the risk and severity of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). METHODS: Community-dwelling residents in Lishui City, China, from the cross-sectional survey in the PRECISE cohort study (Polyvascular Evaluation for Cognitive Impairment and Vascular Events) conducted from 2017 to 2019. We included 1644 of 3067 community-dwelling adults in the PRECISE study after excluding those with incorrect, incomplete, insufficient, or missing clinical or imaging data. Total and modified total CSVD scores, as well as magnetic resonance imaging features, including white matter hyperintensity, lacunes, cerebral microbleeds, enlarged perivascular spaces, and brain atrophy, were assessed at the baseline. The Spinal Cord Toolbox was used to measure the upper cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area of the C1 to C3 segments of the spinal cord and its average value was taken as MUCCA. Participants were divided into 4 groups according to quartiles of MUCCA. Associations were analyzed using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, current smoking and drinking, medical history, intracranial volume, and total cortical volume. RESULTS: The means±SD age of the participants was 61.4±6.5 years, and 635 of 1644 participants (38.6%) were men. The MUCCA was smaller in patients with CSVD than those without CSVD. Using the total CSVD score as a criterion, the MUCCA was 61.78±6.12 cm2 in 504 of 1644 participants with CSVD and 62.74±5.94 cm2 in 1140 of 1644 participants without CSVD. Using the modified total CSVD score, the MUCCA was 61.81±6.04 cm2 in 699 of 1644 participants with CSVD and 62.91±5.94 cm2 in 945 of 1644 without CSVD. There were statistical differences between the 2 groups after adjusting for covariates in 3 models. The MUCCA was negatively associated with the total and modified total CSVD scores (adjusted ß value, -0.009 [95% CI, -0.01 to -0.003] and -0.007 [95% CI, -0.01 to -0.0006]) after adjustment for covariates. Furthermore, the MUCCA was negatively associated with the white matter hyperintensity burden (adjusted ß value, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.02 to -0.003]), enlarged perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia (adjusted ß value, -0.005 [95% CI, -0.009 to -0.001]), lacunes (adjusted ß value, -0.004 [95% CI, -0.007 to -0.0007]), and brain atrophy (adjusted ß value, -0.009 [95% CI, -0.01 to -0.004]). CONCLUSIONS: The MUCCA and CSVD were correlated. Spinal cord atrophy may serve as an imaging marker for CSVD; thus, small vessel disease may involve the spinal cord in addition to being intracranial.