Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Regional Therapy Approaches for Gastric Cancer with Limited Peritoneal Disease.
Li, Amy Y; Sedighim, Shaina; Tajik, Fatemeh; Khan, Aaqil M; Radhakrishnan, Vinodh K; Dayyani, Farshid; Senthil, Maheswari.
Afiliação
  • Li AY; Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 3800 Chapman Ave, Ste 7400, 92868, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Sedighim S; Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 3800 Chapman Ave, Ste 7400, 92868, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Tajik F; Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 3800 Chapman Ave, Ste 7400, 92868, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Khan AM; Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 3800 Chapman Ave, Ste 7400, 92868, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Radhakrishnan VK; Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 3800 Chapman Ave, Ste 7400, 92868, Orange, CA, USA.
  • Dayyani F; Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, USA.
  • Senthil M; Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 3800 Chapman Ave, Ste 7400, 92868, Orange, CA, USA. m.senthil@uci.edu.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 55(2): 534-548, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277055
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Despite advances in systemic therapy, outcomes of patients with gastric cancer (GC) peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) remain poor, in part because of poor penetrance of systemic therapy into peritoneal metastasis due to the plasma-peritoneal barrier and anarchic intra-tumoral circulation. Hence, regional treatment approach with administration of chemotherapy directly into the peritoneal cavity (intraperitoneal, IP) under various conditions, combined with or without cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has remained an area of significant research interest. The purpose of this review is to provide high-level evidence for regional treatment approaches in the management of GCPC with limited peritoneal disease.

METHODS:

A review of the current literature and ongoing clinical trials for regional IP therapies for GCPC was performed. Studies included in this review comprise of phase III randomized controlled trials, non-randomized phase II studies, high-impact retrospective studies, and active ongoing clinical trials for each available IP modality.

RESULTS:

The three common IP approaches are heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC) and more recently introduced, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC). These IP approaches have been combined with systemic therapy and/or CRS with varying degrees of promising results, demonstrating evidence of improvements in survival rates and peritoneal disease control. Patient selection, optimization of systemic therapy, and completeness of cytoreduction have emerged as major factors influencing the design of contemporary and ongoing trials.

CONCLUSION:

IP chemotherapy has a clear role in the management of patients with GCPC, and when combined with CRS in appropriately selected patients has the potential to significantly improve survival. Ongoing and upcoming IP therapy clinical trials hold great promise to shape the treatment paradigm for GCPC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Peritoneais / Neoplasias Gástricas / Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastrointest Cancer Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Peritoneais / Neoplasias Gástricas / Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastrointest Cancer Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos