Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep Learning Prediction of Cervical Spine Surgery Revision Outcomes Using Standard Laboratory and Operative Variables.
Schonfeld, Ethan; Shah, Aaryan; Johnstone, Thomas Michael; Rodrigues, Adrian; Morris, Garret K; Stienen, Martin N; Veeravagu, Anand.
Afiliação
  • Schonfeld E; Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. Electronic address: ethan.schonfeld@stanford.edu.
  • Shah A; Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Johnstone TM; Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Rodrigues A; Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Morris GK; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Stienen MN; Department of Neurosurgery & Spine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen Medical School, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
  • Veeravagu A; Neurosurgery Artificial Intelligence Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
World Neurosurg ; 185: e691-e699, 2024 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408699
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cervical spine procedures represent a major proportion of all spine surgery. Mitigating the revision rate following cervical procedures requires careful patient selection. While complication risk has successfully been predicted, revision risk has proven more challenging. This is likely due to the absence of granular variables in claims databases. The objective of this study was to develop a state-of-the-art model of revision prediction of cervical spine surgery using laboratory and operative variables.

METHODS:

Using the Stanford Research Repository, patients undergoing a cervical spine procedure between 2016 and 2022 were identified (N = 3151), and recent laboratory values were collected. Patients were classified into separate cohorts by revision outcome and time frame. Machine and deep learning models were trained to predict each revision outcome from laboratory and operative variables.

RESULTS:

Red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, red blood cell distribution width, platelet count, carbon dioxide, anion gap, and calcium all were significantly associated with ≥1 revision cohorts. For the prediction of 3-month revision, the deep neural network achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.833. The model demonstrated increased performance for anterior versus posterior and arthrodesis versus decompression procedures.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our deep learning approach successfully predicted 3-month revision outcomes from demographic variables, standard laboratory values, and operative variables in a cervical spine surgery cohort. This work used standard laboratory values and operative codes as meaningful predictive variables for revision outcome prediction. The increased performance on certain procedures evidences the need for careful development and validation of one-size-fits-all risk scores for spine procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Vértebras Cervicais / Aprendizado Profundo Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reoperação / Vértebras Cervicais / Aprendizado Profundo Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article