Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MRI, Associations with Clinical Severity and Prognosis in Ischemic Strokes.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores have important shortcomings. Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging might offer more valuable information in ischemic strokes assessment. PURPOSE: To utilize APTw, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) for the assessment of clinical symptom severity and 90-day prognosis in patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke. STUDY TYPE Prospective. SUBJECTS: 61 patients (mean age 63.2 ± 9.7 years; 46 males, 15 females) with ischemic strokes were included in the study. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3T/turbo spin echo (TSE) T1 -weighted imaging, T2 -weighted imaging, T2 -fluid attenuated inversion recovery (T2 -FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and single-shot TSE APTw imaging. ASSESSMENT APTw, ADC, and CTP were used to compare patient subgroups and construct a prognostic nomogram model. STATISTICAL TESTS Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Pearson correlation analysis, multivariate logistic regression analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA), receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs). The significance threshold was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Correlation analysis revealed that APTw and NIHSS exhibit the highest correlation (r = -0.634, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.418 to -0.782), surpassing that of ADC and lesion size. Multivariable analysis revealed APTw (odds ratio [OR] 0.905, 95% CI 0.845-0.970), ADC (OR 0.745, 95% CI 0.609-0.911), and infarct core-cerebral blood volume (IC-CBV) (OR 0.547, 95% CI 0.310-0.964) as potential risk factors associated with a poor prognosis. The nomogram model demonstrated the highest predictive efficacy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.960 (95% CI 0.911-0.988), exceeding that of APTw, ADC, and IC-CBV individually. DATA CONCLUSION: The APTw technique holds potential value in categorizing and managing patients with ischemic stroke, offering guidance for the implementation of clinical treatment strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY Stage 2.