Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of Scleral Buckling After Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy.
Tran, Tuan; Chen, Henry; He, Bonnie; Albiani, David; Kirker, Andrew; Merkur, Andrew; Maberley, David; Mammo, Zaid.
Afiliação
  • Tran T; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Chen H; Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • He B; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Albiani D; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Kirker A; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Merkur A; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Maberley D; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Mammo Z; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Vitreoretin Dis ; 8(2): 131-137, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465366
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To assess the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes that had secondary scleral buckle (SB) surgery after unsuccessful pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods:

A retrospective study, performed over a 12-year period, comprised patients who had secondary SB procedures after failed primary PR. Clinical parameters (eg, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], lens status, macula status, details of RRD and subretinal fluid) were assessed at presentation, before additional procedures, and at follow-up (6 months, 1 year, and last visit). Statistical comparisons were made using Brown-Forsythe and Welch analysis-of-variance tests, with significance levels set at P < .05.

Results:

Fifty-four eyes with adequate follow-up were included. Forty-four (81.5%) of 54 eyes had successful retinal reattachment with secondary SB alone. The remaining eyes had subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Patients presenting with macula-on RRD who had successful secondary SB had no statistically significant change in BCVA from baseline (mean final, 0.23 ± 0.25 logMAR [Snellen 20/34]; P = .999). There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA in patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had successful secondary SB (mean final, 0.32 ± 0.36 logMAR [20/42]; P < .001 and mean change, -1.06 ± 0.85 logMAR). Ten patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had failed secondary SB had a significant improvement in the final BCVA (mean final, 0.22 ± 0.28 logMAR [20/33]; P = .044), despite the need for an additional PPV to achieve reattachment.

Conclusions:

Secondary SB remains a good option for RRD repair after unsuccessful PR and may avoid the need for PPV.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Vitreoretin Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Vitreoretin Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá