Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Equity and modeling in sustainability science: Examples and opportunities throughout the process.
Giang, Amanda; Edwards, Morgan R; Fletcher, Sarah M; Gardner-Frolick, Rivkah; Gryba, Rowenna; Mathias, Jean-Denis; Venier-Cambron, Camille; Anderies, John M; Berglund, Emily; Carley, Sanya; Erickson, Jacob Shimkus; Grubert, Emily; Hadjimichael, Antonia; Hill, Jason; Mayfield, Erin; Nock, Destenie; Pikok, Kimberly Kivvaq; Saari, Rebecca K; Samudio Lezcano, Mateo; Siddiqi, Afreen; Skerker, Jennifer B; Tessum, Christopher W.
Afiliação
  • Giang A; Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
  • Edwards MR; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
  • Fletcher SM; La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
  • Gardner-Frolick R; Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
  • Gryba R; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
  • Mathias JD; Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
  • Venier-Cambron C; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
  • Anderies JM; Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
  • Berglund E; Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
  • Carley S; Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
  • Erickson JS; Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, UR LISC, Centre de Clermont-Ferrand, Aubière F-63178, France.
  • Grubert E; Department of Environmental Geography, Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
  • Hadjimichael A; School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.
  • Hill J; Department of Civil Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
  • Mayfield E; Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, Stuart Weitzman School of Design, Department of City Planning, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
  • Nock D; Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
  • Pikok KK; Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
  • Saari RK; Keough School of Global Affairs, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.
  • Samudio Lezcano M; Department of Geosciences, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
  • Siddiqi A; Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
  • Skerker JB; Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
  • Tessum CW; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 121(13): e2215688121, 2024 Mar 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498705
ABSTRACT
Equity is core to sustainability, but current interventions to enhance sustainability often fall short in adequately addressing this linkage. Models are important tools for informing action, and their development and use present opportunities to center equity in process and outcomes. This Perspective highlights progress in integrating equity into systems modeling in sustainability science, as well as key challenges, tensions, and future directions. We present a conceptual framework for equity in systems modeling, focused on its distributional, procedural, and recognitional dimensions. We discuss examples of how modelers engage with these different dimensions throughout the modeling process and from across a range of modeling approaches and topics, including water resources, energy systems, air quality, and conservation. Synthesizing across these examples, we identify significant advances in enhancing procedural and recognitional equity by reframing models as tools to explore pluralism in worldviews and knowledge systems; enabling models to better represent distributional inequity through new computational techniques and data sources; investigating the dynamics that can drive inequities by linking different modeling approaches; and developing more nuanced metrics for assessing equity outcomes. We also identify important future directions, such as an increased focus on using models to identify pathways to transform underlying conditions that lead to inequities and move toward desired futures. By looking at examples across the diverse fields within sustainability science, we argue that there are valuable opportunities for mutual learning on how to use models more effectively as tools to support sustainable and equitable futures.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá