Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Frequency of cul-de-sac obliteration in surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective analysis.
Hirata, Go; Miyagi, Etsuko; Maruyama, Yasuyo; Ishikawa, Rena; Hirabuki, Tomoo.
Afiliação
  • Hirata G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odawara Municipal Hospital, 46 Kuno, Odawara City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. gh046@yahoo.co.jp.
  • Miyagi E; Department of Gynecology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. gh046@yahoo.co.jp.
  • Maruyama Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Ishikawa R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odawara Municipal Hospital, 46 Kuno, Odawara City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
  • Hirabuki T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odawara Municipal Hospital, 46 Kuno, Odawara City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(6): 2931-2935, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584245
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

HYPOTHESIS:

We aimed to clarify the frequency of cul-de-sac obliteration in patients undergoing POP surgery.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic POP surgery at our hospital between April 2017 and September 2021.

RESULTS:

In total, 191 cases were included in the analysis. Ten patients (5.2%) had cul-de-sac obliteration. No difference in age (73 years vs. 72 years, P = 0.99), parity (2 vs. 2, P = 0.64), or body mass index (BMI) (25.7 kg/m2 vs. 24.7 kg/m2, P = 0.34) was observed between the cul-de-sac obliteration and normal groups. No significant differences were observed in the rate of previous abdominal surgery (50.0% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.46), rate of POP - quantification system (POP-Q) ≥ 2 posterior prolapse (40.0% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.98), and effect of defecation symptoms on the prolapse quality of life (p-QOL) score (vaginal bulge emptying bowels 2.5 vs. 3.5, P = 0.15; empty bowel feeling 3 vs. 3, P = 0.72, constipation 3.5 vs. 3, P = 0.58; straining to open bowels 3.5 vs. 3, P = 0.82; empty bowels with fingers 1 vs. 1, P = 0.55) between the cul-de-sac obliteration and normal groups. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for the cul-de-sac obliteration was performed for age, number of births, previous abdominal surgery, and presence of rectocele; however no significant risk factors were extracted.

CONCLUSION:

Predicting cul-de-sac obliteration preoperatively in patients undergoing POP surgery based on age, number of previous surgeries, previous abdominal surgeries, rectocele, and defecation symptoms is difficult.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão