Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of an Integrated Wasting Prevention and Screening Intervention Package in Burkina Faso and Mali.
Brander, Rebecca L; Puett, Chloe; Becquey, Elodie; Leroy, Jef L; Ruel, Marie T; Sessou, Fidele Eric; Huybregts, Lieven.
Afiliação
  • Brander RL; Nutrition, Diets, and Health Unit, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DiC, United States. Electronic address: r.brander@cgiar.org.
  • Puett C; Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Program in Public Health, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Becquey E; Nutrition, Diets, and Health Unit, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DiC, United States.
  • Leroy JL; Nutrition, Diets, and Health Unit, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DiC, United States.
  • Ruel MT; Nutrition, Diets, and Health Unit, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DiC, United States.
  • Sessou FE; UNICEF Innocenti Global Office of Research and Foresight, Florence, Italy.
  • Huybregts L; Nutrition, Diets, and Health Unit, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DiC, United States.
J Nutr ; 2024 Apr 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599389
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about costs and cost effectiveness of interventions that integrate wasting prevention into screening for child wasting.

OBJECTIVES:

This study's objective was to estimate the cost and cost-effectiveness of an intervention that integrated behavior change communication (BCC) and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) into platforms for wasting screening in Burkina Faso (a facility-based platform, where BCC was enhanced compared with standard care) and Mali (a community-based platform, with standard BCC).

METHODS:

Activity-based costing was used to estimate the cost per child-contact for the intervention and the comparison group, which did not receive the intervention. Costs were ascertained from accounting records, interviews, surveys, and observations. The number of child-contacts was calculated using population size estimates and average attendance rates for each service. Costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted were estimated using a Markov model populated with data from the parent trials on impact of wasting incidence and treatment coverage.

RESULTS:

In the intervention group in Burkina Faso, the cost per child-contact of facility-based screening was $0.85 of enhanced BCC was $4.28, and of SQ-LNS was $8.86. In Mali, the cost per child-contact of community-based screening was $0.57, standard BCC was $0.72, and SQ-LNS was $4.14. Although no SQ-LNS costs were incurred in the comparison groups (hence lower total costs), costs per child-contact for screening and BCC were higher because coverage of these services was lower. The intervention package cost $1073 per DALY averted in Burkina Faso and $747 in Mali.

CONCLUSIONS:

Integration of wasting prevention into screening for child wasting led to higher total costs but lower unit costs than standard screening due to increased coverage. Greater cost-effectiveness could be achieved if BCC were strengthened and led to improved caregiver health and nutrition practices and if screening triggered appropriate use of services and higher treatment coverage.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Nutr Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Nutr Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article