Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health Care Lobbying and Oncology.
Choradia, Nirmal; Mitchell, Aaron; Nipp, Ryan.
Afiliação
  • Choradia N; Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
  • Mitchell A; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Nipp R; University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 22(4): 226-230, 2024 04 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648846
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The health care industry spends more on lobbying than any other industry, with more than $700 million spent in 2022. However, health care lobbying related to cancer has not been characterized. In this study, we sought to describe overall health sector lobbying spending and oncology-related lobbying spending across patient and clinician organizations.

METHODS:

We obtained lobbying data from OpenSecrets.org and the Federal Election Commission. Overall health sector lobbying spending was categorized by OpenSecrets into 4 groups pharmaceuticals/health products, health services/health maintenance organizations (HMOs), hospitals/nursing homes, and health professionals. We then identified and categorized 4 oncology-related lobbying groups oncology physician professional organizations (OPPOs), prospective payment system (PPS)-exempt cancer hospitals, patient advocacy organizations, and provider networks (eg, US Oncology Network). We described temporal trends in lobbying spending from 2014 to 2022, in both overall dollar value (inflation-adjusted 2023 dollars) and in per-physician spending (using American Association of Medical Colleges [AAMC] data for number of hematologists/oncologists) using a Mann-Kendall trend test.

RESULTS:

Among the overall health sector lobbying, pharmaceuticals/health products had the greatest increase in lobbying spending, with an increase from $294 million in 2014 to >$376 million in 2022 (P=.0006). In contrast, lobbying spending by health professionals did not change, remaining at $96 million (P=.35). Regarding oncology-related lobbying, OPPOs and PPS-exempt cancer hospitals had a significant increase of 170% (P=.016) and 62% (P=.009), respectively. Per-physician spending also demonstrated an increase from $60 to $134 for OPPOs and from $168 to $226 for PPS-exempt cancer hospitals. Overall, OPPO lobbying increased as a percentage of overall physician lobbying from 1.16% in 2014 to 3.76% in 2022.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although overall health sector lobbying has increased, physician/health professional lobbying has remained relatively stable in recent years, spending for lobbying by OPPOs has increased. Continued efforts to understand the utility and value of lobbying in health care and across oncology are needed as the costs of care continue to increase.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Manobras Políticas / Oncologia Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Moldávia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Manobras Políticas / Oncologia Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Moldávia