Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prophylactic treatment of FSGS recurrence in patients who relapsed in a previous kidney graft.
Uro-Coste, Charlotte; Lambert, Céline; Audard, Vincent; Couzi, Lionel; Caillard, Sophie; Büchler, Matthias; Del Bello, Arnaud; Malvezzi, Paolo; Pernin, Vincent; Colosio, Charlotte; Mesnard, Laurent; Bertrand, Dominique; Martinez, Frank; Ducloux, Didier; Poulain, Coralie; Thierry, Antoine; Danthu, Clément; Greze, Clarisse; Lanaret, Camille; Moal, Valérie; Hertig, Alexandre; Dantal, Jacques; Legendre, Christophe; Chatelet, Valérie; Sicard, Antoine; Gosset, Clément; Maillard, Nicolas; Duveau, Agnès; Petit, Clémence; Kamar, Nassim; Heng, Anne-Elisabeth; Anglicheau, Dany; Garrouste, Cyril.
Afiliação
  • Uro-Coste C; Service de Néphrologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Lambert C; Unité de Biostatistiques, DRCI, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Audard V; Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation Centre de Référence Maladie Rare « Syndrome Néphrotique Idiopathique ¼, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France.
  • Couzi L; Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Caillard S; Service de Néphrologie, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
  • Büchler M; Service de Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
  • Del Bello A; Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'Organes, CHU Toulouse, INSERM U1043, IFR-BMT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
  • Malvezzi P; Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
  • Pernin V; Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation, Hôpital Lapeyronie, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Colosio C; Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, CHU Reims, Reims, France.
  • Mesnard L; Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, APHP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
  • Bertrand D; Service de Néphrologie, CHRU, Rouen, France.
  • Martinez F; Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Ducloux D; Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Poulain C; Service de Néphrologie-Médecine Interne-Dialyse-Transplantation, CHU d'Amiens, Amiens, France.
  • Thierry A; Service de Néphrologie-Hémodialyse-Transplantation Rénale, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • Danthu C; Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.
  • Greze C; Service de Néphrologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Lanaret C; Service de Néphrologie, CH Jacques Lacarin, Vichy, France.
  • Moal V; Aix Marseille Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Conception, Centre de Néphrologie et Transplantation Rénale, Marseille, France.
  • Hertig A; Service de Néphrologie, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
  • Dantal J; Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Service de Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Legendre C; Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Chatelet V; Centre Universitaire des Maladies Rénales, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France.
  • Sicard A; Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation, CHU Nice, Nice, France.
  • Gosset C; Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation, CHU Nice, Nice, France.
  • Maillard N; Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
  • Duveau A; Service de Néphrologie, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
  • Petit C; Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Service de Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Kamar N; Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d'Organes, CHU Toulouse, INSERM U1043, IFR-BMT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
  • Heng AE; Service de Néphrologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Anglicheau D; Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Garrouste C; Service de Néphrologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38794882
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

HYPOTHESIS:

Recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is common after kidney transplantation and is classically associated with a significant decrease in graft survival. A major risk factor is a prior history of FSGS recurrence on a previous graft. This analysis reports the impact of a prophylactic treatment of FSGS recurrence in very high-risk patients who experienced a recurrence on a previous graft.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective multicentre observational study in 25 French transplantation centres. The inclusion criteria were patients aged more than 18 years who had undergone kidney transplant between December 31, 2004, and December 31, 2020, and who had a history of FSGS recurrence on a previous graft.

RESULTS:

We identified 66 patients 40 received prophylactic treatment (PT+), including intravenous cyclosporine and/or rituximab and/or plasmapheresis, and 26 did not receive any prophylactic treatment (PT-). The time to progression to end-stage kidney disease was similar between groups. The PT + group was younger at FSGS diagnosis and at the time of kidney retransplantation and lost their previous graft faster. The overall recurrence rate was 72.7% (76.9% in the PT- group and 70.0% in the PT + group, P = 0.54). At least partial remission was achieved in 87.5% of patients. The 5-year graft survival was 67.7% (95% CI 53.4 to 78.4%) 65.1% (95%CI 48.7 to 77.4%) in patients with FSGS recurrence vs. 77.3% (95% CI 43.8 to 92.3%) in patients without recurrence (P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION:

Our study suggests that prophylactic treatment should not be used routinely in patients receiving a second transplantation after recurrence of FSGS on a previous graft. The recurrence rate is high regardless of the use of prophylactic treatment. However, the 5-year graft survival remains satisfactory.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nephrol Dial Transplant Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nephrol Dial Transplant Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França