Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine Combination Therapy for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Deng, Jiawen; Zuo, Qi Kang; Venugopal, Kaden; Hung, Jay; Zubair, Areeba; Blais, Sara; Porter, Victoria; Moskalyk, Myron; Heybati, Kiyan.
Afiliação
  • Deng J; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zuo QK; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Venugopal K; UBC Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Hung J; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zubair A; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Blais S; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Porter V; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Moskalyk M; UBC Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Heybati K; UBC Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; : 1-21, 2024 Jun 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870923
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT) combination therapy in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

METHODS:

We conducted a database search in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HAT against placebo/standard of care or against hydrocortisone in sepsis/septic shock patients. Outcomes included mortality, ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS), vasopressor durations, mechanical ventilation durations, change in SOFA at 72 h, and adverse events. RCT results were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS:

Fifteen RCTs (N = 2,594) were included. At 72 h, HAT reduced SOFA scores from baseline (mean difference [MD] -1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.58 to -0.74, I2 = 0%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT also reduced the duration of vasopressor use (MD -18.80 h, 95% CI -23.67 to -13.93, I2 = 64%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on moderate quality of evidence. HAT increased hospital LOS (MD 2.05 days, 95% CI 0.15-3.95, I2 = 57%) compared to placebo/SoC, based on very low quality of evidence. HAT did not increase incidence of adverse events compared to placebo/SoC.

CONCLUSIONS:

HAT appears beneficial in reducing vasopressor use and improving organ function in sepsis/septic shock patients. However, its advantages over hydrocortisone alone remain unclear. Future research should use hydrocortisone comparators and distinguish between sepsis-specific and comorbidity- or care-withdrawal-related mortality.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Assunto da revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int Arch Allergy Immunol Assunto da revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá