Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors influencing gastrostomy tube removal.
Parr, Heather; White, Sean; Loversidge, Claire; Shiha, Mohamed G; Raju, Suneil A; El Atrash, Malik S; McAlindon, Mark E; Hopper, Andrew D; Williams, Elizabeth A; Sanders, David S.
Afiliação
  • Parr H; Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • White S; Home Enteral Feeding Dietetics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • Loversidge C; Home Enteral Feeding Dietetics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • Shiha MG; Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • Raju SA; Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • El Atrash MS; Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • McAlindon ME; Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • Hopper AD; Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Williams EA; Department of Oncology & Metabolism, The University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
  • Sanders DS; Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; : 1-5, 2024 Jun 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885119
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

When commencing enteral feeding, patients and families will want to know the likelihood of returning to an oral diet. There is a paucity of data on the prognosis of patients with gastrostomies. We describe a large dataset of patients, which identifies factors influencing gastrostomy removal and assesses the likelihood of the patient having at home enteral nutrition.

METHODS:

Retrospective data was collected on patients from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals who had received a gastrostomy and had outpatient enteral feeding between January 2016 and December 2019. Demographic data, indication and outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS:

A total of 451 patients were assessed, median age 67.7. 183/451(40.6%) gastrostomies were for head and neck cancer, 88/451 (19.5%) for stroke, 28/451 (6.2%) for Motor Neuron Disease, 32/451 (7.1%) for other neurodegenerative causes, 120/451 (26.6%) other. Of the 31.2% who had their gastrostomy removed within 3 years, head and neck cancer was the most common indication (58.3%) followed by stroke (10.2%), Motor Neuron Disease (7.1%) and other neurodegenerative diseases (3.1%). Gastrostomy removal was significantly influenced by age, place of residence, and having head and neck cancer (p < 0.05). There was the greatest likelihood of removal within the first year (24%). 70.5% had enteral feeding at home.

CONCLUSION:

This large cohort study demonstrates 31.2% of patients had their gastrostomy removed within 3 years. Head and neck cancer patients, younger age and residing at home can help positively predict removal. Most patients manage their feeding at home rather than a nursing home. This study provides new information on gastrostomy outcomes when counselling patients to provide realistic expectations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido