Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Wilson, Monique V; Braithwaite, Felicity A; Arnold, John B; Crouch, Sophie M; Moore, Emily; Heil, Alrun; Cooper, Kay; Stanton, Tasha R.
Afiliação
  • Wilson MV; Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Braithwaite FA; Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.
  • Arnold JB; Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Crouch SM; Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.
  • Moore E; Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Heil A; Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Cooper K; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Stanton TR; Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
Pain ; 2024 Jun 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916521
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália